How to derive the coefficient of thermal expansion?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the relationship between Young's Modulus and the coefficient of linear thermal expansion, highlighting their inverse proportionality. It begins by explaining how to calculate strain from thermal expansion using basic principles and formulas. The derivation involves substituting the change in length due to thermal expansion into the Young's Modulus equation. The final conclusion is that Young's Modulus is inversely proportional to the coefficient of linear thermal expansion, confirming the initial claim. A solid understanding of the relevant formulas is essential for this derivation.
tony_engin
Messages
45
Reaction score
0
Hi!
How to relate the Young's Modulus with the coefficient of linear thermal expansion? It is known that they are inversely proportional to each other, but how to prove this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello,

It can be derived from basic principles. You can start by finding the strain caused by
the thermal expansion. The change in length for this part can be found by subbing in the thermal expansion formuale. Hence we have found the strain.

Y=stress/strain
=Fl/A(dl) where dl= change in length
I cannot proceed further than this due to lack of information on which kind of shape it have. ( to calculate A) However, the coefficient of thermal expansion could be seen to be inversely proportional to Y after subbing in the expression for dl.
 
Ok...For this you need to have a good grip on basic formulae

Since you are dealing with linear Young's modulus.First of all Young's Modulus for a wire of a specific material is given by:

Y= \frac{FL}{A (dL)}

where dL=Change in Length

Now change is length due to linear expansion is given by:

dL=L (a) (dT)

a=coefficient of linear expansion
dT=Change in Temperature

Now putting the values in Young's modulus equation:

Y= \frac{F}{A (a) (dT)}

Therefore Y is inversely proportional to a...easy isn't it?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top