How to Determine n for Quantized Energies in a Pendulum?

w3390
Messages
341
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A simple pendulum has a length equal to 0.6 m and has a bob that has a mass equal to 0.5 kg. The energy of this oscillator is quantized, and the allowed values of energy are given by En = (n + 1/2)hf0, where n is an integer and f0 is the frequency of the pendulum. Find n such that En+1 exceeds En by 0.010 percent.

Homework Equations



En=(n+1/2)hf0

The Attempt at a Solution



I thought this sounded like a simple algebra problem, so I set .0009(En+1)=En and solved for n after plugging in the equations. I know there is something wrong with this equation because I keep getting negative, non-integer values for n but I cannot figure out what is wrong. Any help is greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Since my first post, I have tried a revised approach. This time I have En+1=En*1.0001. This gives me (n+1)+(1/2)=(n+(1/2))1.0001. After doing all the algebra, I am getting 9999.5 as my answer for n. Since the question asks for an integer value, I do not know if show input 9999 as my answer or if my answer is just wrong in general.
 
Your second method looks fine, and I would round 9999.5 up to 10000.:approve:
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...

Similar threads

Back
Top