How to draw electric field around neutral object, dipole, and charged object

AI Thread Summary
To sketch electric field lines around a neutral grounded object, a negatively charged object, and a dipole, it's essential to recognize that the neutral object will become polarized due to the influence of the nearby charged object. The negatively charged object will attract field lines towards itself, while the dipole will have lines extending from its positive side towards the negative side. The neutral object will have field lines ending on it, indicating that it is acting like a grounding plane. There will be no direct lines from the dipole to the neutral object, but the polarization effect will influence the field distribution. Understanding these interactions is crucial for accurately representing the electric field in the sketch.
yalublutebya
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I'm working on a homework problem which requires me to roughly sketch electric field lines. The object on the left is neutral and grounded, the object on the right was just struck by lightning (and therefore very negatively charged) and I assume that the neutral object in the middle should now be polarized with + to the right and - to the left.

Homework Equations


None.

The Attempt at a Solution


I know that the negatively charged object will have lots of lines pointing towards it (including a few from the positive half of the dipole), and I assume that the dipole should be drawn with a line or two going from its positive side towards it's negative side, but I am unsure what happens around the neutral object on the left. Should there be any lines from the dipole to (or from) the neutral object? Or from the negative object on the right? Each of the objects are conductors, if that makes a difference.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The neutral object is likea grounding plane. this means that the field lines will end on it.
 

Thread 'Errors and significant figures'

I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
View full post »
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
View full post »

Similar threads

External forces required to move an electric dipole quasi-statically
Replies
14
Views
1K
Dipole placed in a uniform electric field
Replies
11
Views
3K
Understanding the energy of a dipole in a uniform electric field
Replies
2
Views
2K
Can a neutral insulator be attracted to a charged object?
Replies
2
Views
5K
A few questions regarding Neutral Objects
Replies
17
Views
3K
Direction of electric field vector on the surface of charged conductor
Replies
9
Views
1K
Electric Field Lines for Two Objects on a Frictionless Table
Replies
1
Views
2K
Why Does the Electric Field Sum Instead of Cancel with Opposite Charges?
Replies
6
Views
2K
Is This Electric Field Representation Accurate?
Replies
28
Views
2K
Why Does Positive Charge Exert Elec. Field Beyond Neg. Charge?
Replies
16
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top