How to Find Linear Acceleration Without Cylinder Radius?

AI Thread Summary
To find linear acceleration without knowing the cylinder radius, the relationship between the linear acceleration of the center of mass and the point on the cylinder must be understood. The linear acceleration can be derived using the forces and masses involved, specifically through the equations of motion and torque. The radius cancels out in the calculations, simplifying the process. By applying the given values, the expected acceleration of 2.19 m/s² can be confirmed. This approach demonstrates that the problem can be solved without the radius by focusing on the dynamics involved.
ricles
Messages
10
Reaction score
5
Homework Statement
A solid cylinder A of uniform mass given ##m_1## can rotate freely along an axis fixed to a support B of given mass ##m_2##, also given. A constant force ##F## is applied at the extremity (point ##k##) of a light thread firmly rolled in the cylinder. The friction between the support and the horizontal place is negligible. Find the acceleration at point ##k##.
Relevant Equations
Equations of linear and rotational motion.
This comes from a list of exercises, and setting ##m_1 = 5.4kg##, ##m_2 = 9.3kg## and ##F=5N##, the answer should yield ##2.19m/s^2## (of course, supposing the answer is right).

If I knew the radius ##R## of the cylinder, I could find its momentum and use it to find the linear acceleration. I'm really mystified on how to go about this problem without the radius 🤔
cylinder_on_support.png

(sorry for the poor drawing :p)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ricles said:
If I knew the radius ##R## of the cylinder, I could find its momentum and use it to find the linear acceleration.
It's not clear how you would get from momentum to acceleration.

I'm really mystified on how to go about this problem without the radius 🤔
It could be that ##R## cancels out in the calculations so that the answer doesn't depend on ##R##.

You will probably need to think about the relation between the linear acceleration of ##k## and the linear acceleration of the center of the cylinder.
 
  • Like
Likes Lnewqban
Yes, that's right. It's actually not complicated after thinking a little, we have (##a_k## denoting the acceleration at the point k):
$$
\begin{align}
a_{cm} & = \frac{f}{m_1 + m_2} \\
\tau &= f\cdot R = I\cdot \alpha = \left(\frac12 m_1 R^2 \right) \alpha \therefore \alpha = \frac{2f}{m_1R} \\
a_R &= R\cdot \alpha = \frac{2f}{m_1} \text{ (and this is where the R cancels)}\\
a_k &= a_{cm} + a_R = \frac{2f}{m_1} + \frac{f}{m_1 + m_2}
\end{align}
$$
and plugging the values yields the expected result. It was a simple problem - it's just I was "blocked" from seeing it, so to speak. Anyway, thanks for the encouragement 👍
 
  • Like
Likes Lnewqban and TSny
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top