How to find specific volume given temperature?

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
9 replies · 8K views
EastWindBreaks
Messages
128
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement



upload_2017-12-8_6-47-3.png

upload_2017-12-8_6-47-27.png

Homework Equations


upload_2017-12-8_6-57-34.png


The Attempt at a Solution


upload_2017-12-8_6-47-59.png

I don't understand how the solution got its values, not from the tables right? because I couldn't find such value from all of the tables. Since the pressure is less than the saturated pressure at given temperature, it is in super heated phase. but 90.4 kpa equals 13.1 psia, which is not in the super heated table. can we calculate specific volume without the tables? can we find its volume by finding the density at given temperature and pressure since the mass is known? but which would also require a table to find such density...
 

Attachments

  • upload_2017-12-8_6-47-3.png
    upload_2017-12-8_6-47-3.png
    5.9 KB · Views: 3,434
  • upload_2017-12-8_6-47-27.png
    upload_2017-12-8_6-47-27.png
    7 KB · Views: 8,719
  • upload_2017-12-8_6-47-59.png
    upload_2017-12-8_6-47-59.png
    80.6 KB · Views: 3,371
  • upload_2017-12-8_6-57-34.png
    upload_2017-12-8_6-57-34.png
    73 KB · Views: 3,387
Physics news on Phys.org

Attachments

  • upload_2017-12-8_8-30-59.png
    upload_2017-12-8_8-30-59.png
    43 KB · Views: 3,319
EastWindBreaks said:
Thank you, I found the SI system tables, but i still don't see 0.2302, it is in this region correct? View attachment 216340
where P= 0.10 MPa
Yes. You have to interpolate in the table. Since the behavior is close to ideal gas behavior (with Pv nearly constant), for good accuracy, you should interpolate on (Pv) rather than simply on v.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: EastWindBreaks
Chestermiller said:
Yes. You have to interpolate in the table. Since the behavior is close to ideal gas behavior (with Pv nearly constant), for good accuracy, you should interpolate on (Pv) rather than simply on v.
BvU said:

got it, so we have to do linear interpolate (assume the trend is linear?) for vapors when the table doesn't have the value we want, and we use quality(
upload_2017-12-10_21-46-25.png
)to find the properties for saturated state where the temperature and pressure are dependent on each other. Do we use
upload_2017-12-10_21-46-51.png
to find properties of sub cooled liquid as well? since I did not find a table for sub-cooled liquid.
 

Attachments

  • upload_2017-12-10_21-46-16.png
    upload_2017-12-10_21-46-16.png
    1.1 KB · Views: 780
  • upload_2017-12-10_21-46-25.png
    upload_2017-12-10_21-46-25.png
    1.1 KB · Views: 2,584
  • upload_2017-12-10_21-46-51.png
    upload_2017-12-10_21-46-51.png
    1.1 KB · Views: 2,578
EastWindBreaks said:
got it, so we have to do linear interpolate (assume the trend is linear?) for vapors when the table doesn't have the value we want, and we use quality(View attachment 216469 )to find the properties for saturated state where the temperature and pressure are dependent on each other. Do we use View attachment 216470 to find properties of sub cooled liquid as well? since I did not find a table for sub-cooled liquid.
You should be able to find the tabulated values of sub cooled liquid in your tables (sometimes called pressurized liquids).

I also point out again that, unless you interpolate on Pv rather than v, you will not get an accurate answer for the interpolated v. I guarantee that you linear interpolation will not deliver 0.2303.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: EastWindBreaks
Chestermiller said:
You should be able to find the tabulated values of sub cooled liquid in your tables (sometimes called pressurized liquids).

I also point out again that, unless you interpolate on Pv rather than v, you will not get an accurate answer for the interpolated v. I guarantee that you linear interpolation will not deliver 0.2303.

Thank you, now I understand what you said about Pv being nearly constant. I just want to confirm, you said interpolate on Pv, you mean like this?:
upload_2017-12-11_0-59-35.png

I got v= 0.2326, a little off from 0.2302.
 

Attachments

  • upload_2017-12-11_0-59-35.png
    upload_2017-12-11_0-59-35.png
    76.2 KB · Views: 2,231
Chestermiller said:
At P= 60000 Pa, v = 0.35048 m^3/kg, and Pv = 21029 J/kg

At P = 100000 Pa, v = 0.20743 m^3/kg, and Pv = 20743 J/kg

So, at P = 90400 Pa, $$Pv=21029+\frac{(90400-60000)}{(100000-60000}(20743-21029)=20812$$ And, ##v=20812/90400=0.2302## m^3/kg.

Thanks a lot! I am so careless, I made a mistake by using P2= 0.14 Mpa instead of 0.1 Mpa.