How to find the coefficient of friction?

AI Thread Summary
To find the coefficient of friction, the discussion revolves around applying Newton's second law, where the net force is the difference between the applied force and the friction force. Given a mass of 3.2 kg and an applied force of 22.8 N resulting in an acceleration of 3.02 m/s², the equations of motion are used to derive the coefficient. The key equations presented include ma = FA + FfK and ma = FA - Mmg, highlighting the relationship between forces. A correction is noted regarding algebraic manipulation, specifically the need to divide all terms by mg to accurately derive the coefficient. Understanding these equations and their proper application is crucial for calculating the coefficient of friction.
trASHf
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
Unknown object has a mass of 3.2kg on steel plank.

Add force:
|FA|=22.8N
|a|=3.02m/s^2

What is the material?
Relevant Equations
Newton's Second Law - sum of all forces = mass * acceleration = ...
GR (bold = mathematical convention)
m = 3.2kg
|applied force| = + 22.8 N
|acceleration| = + 3.02 m/s^2

FBD-hypothetical
^ normal force
|
friction force <-----*-----------> applied force
|
gravitational force

A
ma = FA + FfK
ma = FA -Mmg
ma/mg = FA - M
ma/mg - FA = -M
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi,

Can you imagine it is hard to make sense of this ? Read what you posted
 
Last edited by a moderator:
BvU said:
Hi,

Can you imagine it is hard to make sense of this ? Read what you posted

other than the attempted solution I put there, no I don't think it's hard to make sense of this.
 
trASHf said:
ma = FA + FfK
ma = FA -Mmg
ma/mg = FA - M
ma/mg - FA = -M
Your algebra is faulty when you go from the second equation to the third. You need to divide all the terms on the right side by mg.
 
  • Like
Likes trASHf
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top