How to Find the Shortest Distance to the Brillouin Zone Boundary?

Robbas
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi, I just can't understand the basics with BZ.

How do I find the shortest distance to the BZ boundary, how do I compare the electron energy between the last electron in the 1st BZ with the first electron in the 2nd BZ?

I think I need a visual how to calculate these things, does anyone know any good site with illustrations?

Here's an example:
Q: For what minimum electron concentration Z does the free electron Fermi sphere touch the first Brillouin zone boundary of a BCC metal?
A: Calculating the primitive reciprocal lattice vectors b_i of BCC we find the shortest distance to the BZ boundary |b_i|/2 = √2(π/a).

How do I know the shortest distance is |b_i|/2? From here I know how to finish.

If someone could show me some examples how to solve these types of questions I would be grateful!

Sorry for any grammatic errors, English is not my native language.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Perhaps this will help.

http://www.msm.cam.ac.uk/doitpoms//tlplib/brillouin_zones/zone_construction.php
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thanks for your reply.

Actually I know how to draw the BZ in 2D-lattice, it's just like the WZ-cell.

How do I apply this to calculate the shortest distance to the 1st BZ for a BCC or FCC?
Is it always half of the reciprocal lattice vectors b_i? Or is that specific for a BCC?

Do I understand this correct:
For a BCC is the shortest dist to the 1st BZ .5*(2pi/a)*|0,1,1|=sqrt(2)*pi/a
and for FCC .5*(2pi/a)*|1,1,1|=sqrt(3)*pi/a?
 
The shortest distance to the BZ doesn't necessarily mean it will have the lowest energy. Only if you make the assumption that the Fermi surface is a sphere (for free electrons), which isn't true when you have a potential.
 
To solve this, I first used the units to work out that a= m* a/m, i.e. t=z/λ. This would allow you to determine the time duration within an interval section by section and then add this to the previous ones to obtain the age of the respective layer. However, this would require a constant thickness per year for each interval. However, since this is most likely not the case, my next consideration was that the age must be the integral of a 1/λ(z) function, which I cannot model.
Back
Top