How to find velocity given force and time? (tennis)

AI Thread Summary
To calculate tennis serve speed from a video, the user analyzed force exerted on the ball using a 6000 FPS video and created a Force vs. Time graph. They calculated the strongest force at 93N and the weakest at 11N, leading to an impulse of approximately 0.16 when converted to seconds. However, the resulting velocity of 2.759 m/s is significantly lower than the known serve speed of 142 mph. Feedback suggests that the force calculation only accounts for half of the net force and that the total force should consider the number of strings in contact with the ball. The user seeks further clarification on their methodology to resolve the discrepancies.
Charles Finley
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hey all, so I've got a math project due this weekend and I could seriously use some advice. I am trying to figure out a way to calculate tennis serve speed given a video. I am using this 6000 FPS video here:

Assuming the racket string tension to be 50 lbs (222.41N) I used vectors and geometry to calculate the force exerted on the ball based on the angle from the top of the racket to the ball as it bent the strings. I did this for each frame and then created a Force vs. Time graph. The strongest force I found exerted on the ball was 93N (when the ball was furthest back in the strings, shown in the picture I attached) and the weakest force 11N, the frame right before the ball leaves the strings (again, if this doesn't make sense or work let me know).

On my F/T graph I used frame count (so 1-16) on the x-axis and force (N) on the y-axis. I found the integral to be 839. But I thought that using the frame count on my x-axis might be flawed so I converted to seconds and got the integral (impulse) to be approximately .16. I divided this by the mass (kg) of the tennis ball and got 2.759 m/s, or about 6 miles per hour, which I am assuming would be the final velocity.

Unfortunately, I know the speed of the serve to be 142 mph and thus this does not make any sense. If anyone sees where I went wrong or knows a better way to go about this, any help is appreciated. I attached an image of how I found the force in each frame in case anyone wants too see that.
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2017-12-07 at 5.31.52 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2017-12-07 at 5.31.52 PM.png
    80.7 KB · Views: 656
Physics news on Phys.org
I see two mistakes.
Firstly, your force calculation gives you only half of the net force exerted on the ball by one string. The other half of the force comes from the tension directed down.
Secondly: multiply the force by the number of strings touching the ball to get the total !.

H.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Let there be a person in a not yet optimally designed sled at h meters in height. Let this sled free fall but user can steer by tilting their body weight in the sled or by optimal sled shape design point it in some horizontal direction where it is wanted to go - in any horizontal direction but once picked fixed. How to calculate horizontal distance d achievable as function of height h. Thus what is f(h) = d. Put another way, imagine a helicopter rises to a height h, but then shuts off all...
Back
Top