How to get from <P> to probability density P(k)?

musik132
Messages
11
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Knowing the momentum operator -iħd/dx , the expectation value of momentum and the Fourier transforms how can I prove that <p> = ∫dk [mod square of ψ(k)] h/λ. From this, mod square of ψ(k) is defined to be equal to P(k) right?

Homework Equations


Momentum operator, p: -iħd/dx
Expectation value of p: <p> = ∫ψ(x)*pψ(x)dx
Fourier transform (not going to type here assuming it is known since it is a lengthy pair of eqs)

The Attempt at a Solution


I have tried various "tactics" but the closest I got was through these steps. I used the Fourier transforms of ψ(x) and ψ*(x) to get ψ(k) and ψ*(k) somewhere in the eq for <p>. I tried to integrate by parts to pull both ψ(k) out in front so it would form mod square ψ(k). Basically i get as constants ∫[h/(2piλ)][mod square of ψ(k)]*[a large integral]dk. Here is where i got stuck from the solution the integral should equal 2pi which it looks like it doesn't.

Thank you for your time. This problem seems important to know but I just can't find any solutions online.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's much easier in steps:

(a) Write the position-representation wave function, \psi(t,x)=\langle x|\psi,t \rangle in terms of the momentum-representation wave function, \tilde{\psi}(t,p)=\langle{p}|\psi,t \rangle.

(b) Use the result to evaluate \hat{p} \tilde{\psi}(t,p) from the momentum operator in position representation, \hat{p} \psi(t,x)=-\mathrm{i}/\hbar \partial_x \psi(t,x).

(c) Finally write \langle p \rangle=\langle \psi,t|\hat{p}|\psi,t \rangle.

Above, I assumed the Schrödinger picture for the time dependence (eigen vectors of position and momentum time-independent state ket time dependent).
 
musik132 said:

Homework Statement


Knowing the momentum operator -iħd/dx , the expectation value of momentum and the Fourier transforms how can I prove that <p> = ∫dk [mod square of ψ(k)] h/λ. From this, mod square of ψ(k) is defined to be equal to P(k) right?

Homework Equations


Momentum operator, p: -iħd/dx
Expectation value of p: <p> = ∫ψ(x)*pψ(x)dx
Fourier transform (not going to type here assuming it is known since it is a lengthy pair of eqs)

The Attempt at a Solution


I have tried various "tactics" but the closest I got was through these steps. I used the Fourier transforms of ψ(x) and ψ*(x) to get ψ(k) and ψ*(k) somewhere in the eq for <p>. I tried to integrate by parts to pull both ψ(k) out in front so it would form mod square ψ(k). Basically i get as constants ∫[h/(2piλ)][mod square of ψ(k)]*[a large integral]dk. Here is where i got stuck from the solution the integral should equal 2pi which it looks like it doesn't.

Thank you for your time. This problem seems important to know but I just can't find any solutions online.

How on Earth can anybody check your work if you don't post it? Don't just describe your calculation. Show it. How can we tell if an integral is equal to 2pi if you don't show the integral?
 
Thanks Vanhees but I have not learned this notation yet which i believe will be the next chapter in the book. Once I get a little bit further ill revisit this calculation to see how this notation might simplify things.

Sorry about not posting the work it is a lot to write without knowing latex. Ill give it a try:

|\psi(x)|^{2}=P(x) = \psi^*(x)\psi(x)
&lt;p&gt;=\int\psi^*(x)(-i\hbar\frac{\partial}{\partial x})\psi(x) dx

Knowing Fourier transforms:
\psi(x) = \frac{1}{\sqrt {2\pi}}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\tilde{\psi}(k)e^{ikx} dk

Using the first transform and its complex conjugate we get:
&lt;p&gt;= \int (\frac{1}{\sqrt {2\pi}}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\tilde{\psi^*}(k)e^{-ikx} dk(-i\hbar\frac{\partial}{\partial x})\frac{1}{\sqrt {2\pi}}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\tilde{\psi}(k&#039;)e^{ik&#039;x}dk&#039;) dx

I think here is where i messed up since the complex conjugate of a integral might not be the integral of the complex conjugate, but i proceeded anyways

\int (\frac{k\hbar}{2\pi}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\tilde{\psi^*}(k)e^{-ikx} dk \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\tilde{\psi}(k)e^{ikx}dk) dx

This is where I got stuck since integration by parts didn't help me at all. Also did some "illegal" movement of integrals


Edit: I believe I have solved it so ill just post up my solution for anyone that needs it in the future

\int (\frac{k\hbar}{2\pi}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\tilde{\psi^*}(k)e^{-ikx} dk \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\tilde{\psi}(k&#039;)e^{ik&#039;x}dk&#039;) dx

\int (\frac{k\hbar}{2\pi} \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\tilde{\psi^*}(k)\tilde{\psi}(k&#039;)e^{ix(k&#039;-k)}dkdk&#039;dx

By \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} e^{ix(k&#039;-k)} = 2\pi\delta(k&#039;-k)
This was what I was missing

We get:
k\hbar\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\tilde{\psi^*}(k)\tilde{\psi}(k&#039;)\delta(k&#039;-k)dkdk&#039;
k\hbar\int|\psi(k)|^2dk
 
Last edited:
You started very well! It's important to keep different labels for the k and k&#039; integrals, before you do the x integration. At the end, of course, the k must be under the k integral to get the average momentum. As for any distribution, the expectation value is given by (using p=\hbar k)
\langle p \rangle=\int_{\mathbb{R}} \mathrm{d} k \; \hbar k \; \tilde{P}(k).
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top