How to know the direction of friction?

AI Thread Summary
To determine the direction of friction in a problem involving two blocks on an incline, it's essential to analyze the system's dynamics carefully. The blocks will move in opposite directions, so the friction forces must be set accordingly based on their respective movements. If one block is accelerating down the incline, the friction on that block acts up the incline, while the friction on the other block acts down the incline. The fixed length of the rope connecting the blocks means that if one block moves in one direction, the other must move in the opposite direction, affecting the acceleration and friction direction. Therefore, it's crucial to establish the correct direction of friction based on the expected movement of the blocks to ensure the free body diagram is accurate.
jofree87
Messages
37
Reaction score
0
For the problem here, I am given the kinetic friction of the blocks, and I am suppose to find the acceleration of the blocks. I set the x-axis along the incline with x-positive directed towards the right, and I set both the resultant forces of of A and B down the incline since I don't which one goes up or down. Now since A and B will move in opposite directions, how do I know which way to set the frictions?

Here is a diagram of the problem, and a solution I found online,

They also set the resultant forces in the same direction but they set the frictions in different directions.
 

Attachments

  • capture1.PNG
    capture1.PNG
    15.7 KB · Views: 442
  • capture21.PNG
    capture21.PNG
    23.4 KB · Views: 459
Physics news on Phys.org
Is the free body diagram yours or what you found on the web? Setting the resultant forces on each mass (and hence their accelerations) in the same direction provides an inconsistent picture. Look at the rope connecting the masses. It has fixed length. If mass A is accelerating down the incline (positive x-direction) the bottom part of the rope connected to mass A will get longer. This means that the top part connected to mass B will get shorter which in turn means that the acceleration of mass B is in the negative x-direction. The diagram shows both accelerations in the same direction which is inconsistent.
 
kuruman said:
Is the free body diagram yours or what you found on the web? Setting the resultant forces on each mass (and hence their accelerations) in the same direction provides an inconsistent picture. Look at the rope connecting the masses. It has fixed length. If mass A is accelerating down the incline (positive x-direction) the bottom part of the rope connected to mass A will get longer. This means that the top part connected to mass B will get shorter which in turn means that the acceleration of mass B is in the negative x-direction. The diagram shows both accelerations in the same direction which is inconsistent.

I found the diagram online but I set the resultant forces in the same manner.

I did this because I don't know exactly which block goes up or down. If I work out the problem correctly, then one of the accelerations should end up being negative. But my question is how do I know which way the frictions will go? Can I set them in any direction like how I did with the resultant forces so that it will work out in the end?
 
No you cannot set the frictions in any direction you want. You have to know which way they are for the free body diagram to work. It is a good bet that the bottom block is moving down the incline, in the same direction as the component of the pulling force P along the incline. This would not be the case if the system were moving uphill after being given some initial velocity uphill and before it slides back down again. Are there words in the statement of the problem that say this is the case? If no, then assume that the bottom block is moving downhill.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top