How to quantify fringing fields around a finite width plate electrode?

deusexlumina
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



This isn't homework or coursework as such, but i thought it may be the best place to ask this question. The last time i posted in the other section it was deleted!

Im considering the case of an electrode of finite width L in the x direction. The y direction is perpendicular to the electrode. The electrode is in contact with an N doped region, donor concentration is ND. The region is depleted so that these are the fixed charges. As i approach the end of the electrode in the x direction, the potential drops off rapidly. This is particularly important for the work I am doing. The problem is i cannot find any analytical expressions for the field in this region. The potential should be a "flat bottomed well", with the width of the "flat bottom" determined by the width of the electrode. I tried solving Poissons equation, but it gave me a normal symmetric quadratic potential well. Any ideas?


Homework Equations



Poissons equation

2∅ = (-qNd)/εsi

The Attempt at a Solution



solving it, with the boundary condition that the field is 0 at the edge of the electrode gives:

∅(y) = (-qNDy2)/esi +C1y + C2

The Cs are constants of integration.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The problem is, this gives a normal symmetric quadratic potential well, not the "flat bottomed" one i was expecting. Any ideas?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top