How to Solve Atwood's Problem with a Massive Pulley?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ernay
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mass
ernay
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



In the Atwood's machine shown below the masses of the blocks are ma = 3kg and mb = 2kg. The moment of inertia of this frictionless pulley about its axis is Ic = .6 kg m2 and its radius is Rc = .2m. Note that there is no slipping between the rope and the pulley.

Find the accelerations of the blocks and the angular acceleration of the pulley

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Atwoodmachine.gif
this is the closest diagram i could find... the distance of the right block (I'll name it block 2 and the left block 1) above the ground is h.

I thought of two ways to do this problem, but I wanted to try and use Newton's laws.
I solved it using conservation of energy:
EPot f - EPot i + Kfinal - Kinitial = 0
so we know that:

Kinitial = 0 (since its not moving yet)
EPot f = m1(g)(h)
EPot i = m2(g)(h)
Kfinal = (1/2)m2v2 + (1/2)m1v2 + (1/2) Iw2

then using vf2= vi2+2ah
again vii = 0, so we can now replace every vf2 by 2ah

at this point you have:
m1(g)(h) - m2(g)(h) + (1/2)(ma)(2ah) + (1/2)(m1)(2ah) + (1/2)(I)(2ah/R2)

Now cancel out all the h's and get:
m1(g) - m2(g) + (1/2)(ma)(2a) + (1/2)(m1)(2a) + (1/2)(I)(2a/R2)

After solving for a I got a = .49 m/s2 of the blocks (I'm not concerned with the angular acceleration right now)

I think my answer is right but..
Is there any way to use Newton's Laws... Maybe use the following?
m2(g) - T2 = m2(a)
T1 - m1(g) = m1(a)
Or does this only apply for massless pulleys?
I tried using it, and I get a different Answer... Also if someone could check my answer itd be nice
 
Physics news on Phys.org
M1g - T1 = M1a
T2 - M1g = M2a
torque (t) = T1R - T2R = Ia/r

eliminate T1,T2

M1g -M2g - (T1-T2) = (M1 + M2)a

T1 - T2 = Ia/r^2

M1g - M2g - Ia/r^2 = (M1 + M2)a

a = (M1 - M2)g/(M1 + M2 + I/r^2 )

massles pulley implies I = 0

your answer 0.49 is correct using this approach
 
resaypi said:
M1g - T1 = M1a
T2 - M1g = M2a
torque (t) = T1R - T2R = Ia/r

eliminate T1,T2

M1g -M2g - (T1-T2) = (M1 + M2)a

T1 - T2 = Ia/r^2

M1g - M2g - Ia/r^2 = (M1 + M2)a

a = (M1 - M2)g/(M1 + M2 + I/r^2 )

massles pulley implies I = 0

your answer 0.49 is correct using this approach

Thanks for the help, I get it now... Just another question though... When we consider the pulley to massless does it mean that the tensions are equal? Since T1-T2=Ia/r2 Or am I jumping to a false conclusion? Thanks again
 
True, if we consider the pulley massless T1 = T2. The difference is due to the fact that there is a friction force that turns the pulley.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top