How to Solve for the Electric Field Between Angular Plates?

kargak
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
the electric field between two plates . plates have an angle with each other. first plate has zero potential and the second plate has a V potential.


i guess i must use laplace equation on cylndric coordinates but i couldn't find the answer.


http://img85.imageshack.us/i/adsztw.jpg/
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Looks to me like cylindrical Laplacian is necessary for this problem. What are your boundary conditions??
 
V=0 at angle=0
V=V(0) at angle=beta

all givens are : http://img85.imageshack.us/i/adsztw.jpg/
sylindrical laplacian's only teta part is not equal zero. i wrote it and couldn't get a meaning
 
You are correct about the boundary conditions, but there still can be a contribution from the radial component (you'll see why/how soon).

Clearly there is no z dependence so from separation of variables we can write V(r,\theta)=R(r)\Theta(\theta) (where 0\leq\theta\leq\beta) so that we get

\frac{\nabla^2V}{V}\rightarrow-\frac{r}{R}\frac{\partial}{\partial r}\left(r\frac{\partial R}{\partial r}\right)=\lambda_\theta=\frac{1}{\Theta}\frac{\partial^2\Theta}{\partial\theta^2}

So with the boundary conditions such that V(r,0)=0 and V(r,\beta)=V, what can you determine about the angular function, \Theta and the eigenvalue \lambda_\theta?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top