Hydrostatic Problem: Three tube Manometer

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on understanding the behavior of water in a three-column manometer when a valve is opened. When the valve is opened, a pressure difference between the reservoir and the valve causes water to flow, resulting in varying height changes across the columns. The column closest to the valve (column 3) experiences a greater change in height due to the direct influence of the pressure gradient created by the flow. This pressure gradient is responsible for the observed differences in water levels among the columns. The explanation highlights the importance of pressure dynamics in fluid flow within the manometer system.
Mokha75
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hi guys, new to the forum here.

I have of a conceptual question that I can't wrap my head around.

Here's the situation: there's a reservoir filled with water attached to a "three-column manometer" with each column open to the atmosphere. The horizontal tube that connects all three of the columns at the bottom, has a valve at the end. The valve is in the closed position and then opened to let the water run through.

What I would like to know is when we do this, for a given time period, why do see the water in the column closest to the valve (column 3 below) have a greater change in height as compared to the column closest to the reservoir (column 1)?

Hope I'm making sense

here's my lame attempt at drawing the apparatus:

(__Reservoir__)-------I--------------I-------------I--valve
Column 1 Column 2 Column 3
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, the flow of matter from one side to another will occur due to a pressure difference between the reservoir and valve. The water in the horizontal tube experiences a pressure gradient from the reservoir to the valve, and that is what causes the flow in that direction.

At the same time, this pressure gradient can be observed by placing several vertical columns along the horizontal tube.
 
Thanks!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top