I have one question regarding Kinetic Energy

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the energy of a system with two charged particles, one with charge -q rotating around another with charge Q. The total energy is expressed as E = KE + U, where the potential energy U is given by U = -kQq/r1. The kinetic energy KE is stated as KE = kQq/2r1, and the participant seeks clarification on how this expression for kinetic energy is derived. The relationship between centripetal force and the attractive force between the charges is emphasized, linking it to the kinetic energy of the revolving charge. Ultimately, the participant expresses relief at understanding the concept after some confusion.
Tarabas
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
HW Template missing as it was moved from another forum
The question is.
There are two particles, one with charge -q and the other with charge Q, and -q particle rotates around the Q particle at a radius r1. What is the Energy at this point?
The answer is like this: E= KE + U
So now I know that U= -kQq/r1
But according to the answer: KE= kQq/2r1. And I have no idea how they found this KE. Your help would be appreciated. Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If one charge is revolving around another, then there is a centripetal force acting on the revolving charge. Can you relate this to the attractive force between the charges? How does this relate to the kinetic energy of the revolving charge?
 
PWiz said:
If one charge is revolving around another, then there is a centripetal force acting on the revolving charge. Can you relate this to the attractive force between the charges? How does this relate to the kinetic energy of the revolving charge?
Thnx. I got it. Now I'm laughing how I couldn't figure it out .
 
Happens to the best of us :)
 
  • Like
Likes bhobba and Tarabas
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top