I knowing what i'm looking for -- alpha particle colliding with lead nucleus

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the distance of closest approach for an alpha particle colliding with a lead nucleus, emphasizing the conservation of angular momentum and energy. Participants express confusion over the concept of "closest approach" and how to relate kinetic energy and potential energy in this context. It is clarified that the angular momentum of the alpha particle is conserved, and at closest approach, its velocity is perpendicular to the displacement vector from the nucleus. The total energy of the system can be expressed in terms of kinetic and potential energy, leading to simultaneous equations that can be solved for the distance. The conversation highlights the interplay between mechanics and electromagnetism in solving the problem.
Eric Peraza
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


An alpha particle with kinetic energy 15.0MeVmakes a collision with lead nucleus, but it is not "aimed" at the center of the lead nucleus, and has an initial nonzero angular momentum (with respect to the stationary lead nucleus) of magnitude L=p0b, where p0 is the magnitude of the initial momentum of the alpha particle and b=1.30×10−12m . (Assume that the lead nucleus remains stationary and that it may be treated as a point charge. The atomic number of lead is 82. The alpha particle is a helium nucleus, with atomic number 2.)

What is the distance of closest approach?

Homework Equations


What is going on? This is an E&M class and this doesn't seem to have to do with potentials.
any help on where to start or anything would be great.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
wow, thorough expectations here.
Is this angular momentum conserved? if so, what L does it have at closest approach?
So, how much KE does it have at closest approach? (no, L2/2mR2 is not zero)
hmm ... where did the REST of the KE go?
 
what does it mean by closest approach? that's where i mainly got thrown off. and do i calculate the change in voltage and then calculate the change in energy? I am not sure what the question is asking by "closest approach" but my guess is something to do with voltage and energy
 
Eric Peraza said:
what does it mean by closest approach? that's where i mainly got thrown off. and do i calculate the change in voltage and then calculate the change in energy? I am not sure what the question is asking by "closest approach" but my guess is something to do with voltage and energy

It's a mechanics problem as well as an EM problem. Since you are assuming the lead nucleus is stationary, the angular momentum of the alpha particle is conserved. At closest approach the velocity of the particle is perpendicular to the displacement vector connecting it with the nucleus. Matching that with the given initial angular momentum gives you a relation between v and r. Considering the energy lost by the particle due to the potential gives you another. Solve them simultaneously.
 
Hey there Eric. If you are still having trouble with this problem, you could consider the total energy of the system. In polar coordinates (where r is the distance of the alpha particle from the lead nucleus), the kinetic energy of the system can be written as, noting that the mass is relativistic (as the alpha particle has 15MeV of energy):

KE = 1/2*m*r(dot)^2 + J^2/(2*m*r^2)

As we can treat this as a central force problem, the potential is given by:

U = -(k*q1*q2)/r

Summing these two together gives:

E = 1/2*m*r(dot)^2 + J^2/(2*m*r^2) - (k*q1*q2)/r

Now, what do we know about r at the distance of closest approach? How can we use this to find r?

Let me know if you are still stuck at this point, but I hope that helps.

PS. Sorry for the lack of latex formatting, I am still learning it!
 
15 MeV would be relativistic for an electron, but not for a proton or alpha.
you can use regular Energy conservation (quadratic)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top