I think this is a special relativity question

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the relative speed of two spaceships, A and B, traveling at 0.5c and 0.8c, respectively. Participants debate the correct application of the velocity-addition formula, with initial calculations yielding confusing results. There is a consensus that direct subtraction of velocities is not valid in relativistic mechanics, and the proper use of the formula is necessary. The final calculation suggests that the relative speed of Ship B as observed from Ship A is 0.5c. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding reference frames in special relativity.
psych2012
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Two spaceships are traveling on the interstellar freeway. Ship A is traveling at 0.5 c and Ship B is traveling at 0.8 c. Ship B passes Ship A. How fast does the pilot of Ship A see Ship B moving away from her? (c is speed of light)

Homework Equations



I think the velocity-addition formula is relevant.
V = (v1 + v2) / (1 + ((v1/c) x (v2/c)))

The Attempt at a Solution



V = (0.5c + 0.8c) / (1 + ((0.5c/c) x (0.8c/c))) = 0.93c
This answer just doesn't make sense to me which leads me to believe that one of the values should be negative, or I need to alter the formula.

I'm wondering if maybe it should be V = (0.8c - 0.5c) / (1 + ((0.8c/c) x (0.5c/c))) = 0.21c. I really don't know.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I would say you are correct, that one of the speeds should be negative.

As I read the problem, both ships have measured their speed relative to the freeway, whereas the velocity addition equation, as it is usually derived, is meant to find the speed w of a something with speed w1 measured in one frame that moves relative to another frame with speed w2, both speed being positive in the same direction. Translating this to your problem, one possibility is to map the speeds as w = v1, w1 = v and w2 = v2, with the other possibility being to swap v1 and v2. Inserting this into the velocity addition equation and isolate for v you will find that is transforms into the same velocity addition equation again, now only with a minus for either v1 or v2 depending on which of the mappings you chose.
 
Any other opinions? I'm wondering now if it would just be as simple as 0.8c - 0.5c = 0.3c, since the velocity-addition formula is usually used if there is a third stationary object observing the other two objects in motion, and there is no third object in this problem.
 
psych2012 said:
Any other opinions?

You are of course welcome to ask others to comment, but my reply was not really an opinion even if it did started out sounding like one.

psych2012 said:
I'm wondering now if it would just be as simple as 0.8c - 0.5c = 0.3c, since the velocity-addition formula is usually used if there is a third stationary object observing the other two objects in motion, and there is no third object in this problem.

Direct addition of velocities, while valid in Newtonian mechanics, is never valid in relativistic mechanics and this is true no matter if it involves physical objects or not. The essential aspect is that when you have three different inertial frames of reference that move (on a line) relative to each other you can from the knowledge of two of the speeds calculate the third using the velocity addition equation.
 
Filip Larsen said:
You are of course welcome to ask others to comment, but my reply was not really an opinion even if it did started out sounding like one.

I apologize for suggesting that your reply was an opinion. I used your reasoning to arrive at an answer that I understand and am satisfied with. Thanks for your help.

(0.8c - 0.5c) / (1 + (0.8c/c)(-0.5c/c)) = 0.5c
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top