Ideal Gas Law Equilibrium Requirements

AI Thread Summary
The ideal gas law is not valid under non-equilibrium conditions, such as during the free expansion of an ideal gas. In free expansion, the velocity distribution of gas particles deviates from the Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution due to the lack of interactions at the boundaries of the gas cloud. Fast-moving particles escape outward while slower particles lag behind, disrupting the equilibrium state. This results in a changing ratio of fast to slow molecules, leading to a non-Maxwellian distribution. Overall, the complexities of particle interactions and velocity distributions challenge the applicability of the ideal gas law in such scenarios.
0pt618
Messages
25
Reaction score
1
It is well known that the ideal gas law applies only to an ideal gas, one consisting of particles infinitesimal in size and exhibits no interactions between the particles. Considering an ideal gas, is the ideal gas law valid under non-equilibrium conditions? For example, does the ideal gas law hold for all instants of in the free expansion of an ideal gas?

References, if available, would be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
"Free"expansion? How do you define volume for such a condition? PV = MRT is then not valid.
The Maxwell-Boltzman distribution is not valid either. Let's assume the expansion of a Ne
gas volume starts from an initial equilibrium state. At say 20 C the Ne atoms have an average
velocity of ~850m/s, but there are atoms with velocities close to 0 m/s and some which
move at over 2000 m/s. Clearly in a "free" expansion the velocity distribution at the boundaries of the
expanding Ne cloud will not be Maxwellian.
 
  • Like
Likes 0pt618
Kazys, thank you. But why is it that "the velocity distribution at the boundaries of the gas will not be Maxwellian" in a "free" expansion?
 
My answer is simplistic, and because of that chances are that it is correct. Consider the Ne cloud before its free expansion. Within the could
the molecules interact, the probability is that fast ones loose energy, slow ones gain it. Equilibrium is maintained. At the edges the fast
molecules move faster in all directions including the outward directions. There they do not interact but keep moving. The slow ones
tag behind. Consequently the ratio of fast to slow molecules changes, thus it is no longer Maxwellian.
 
Thanks Kazys - this makes sense. As an aside, you are referring to Occam's razor, when you say the simple answer is usually the correct one, right?
 
Consider an extremely long and perfectly calibrated scale. A car with a mass of 1000 kg is placed on it, and the scale registers this weight accurately. Now, suppose the car begins to move, reaching very high speeds. Neglecting air resistance and rolling friction, if the car attains, for example, a velocity of 500 km/h, will the scale still indicate a weight corresponding to 1000 kg, or will the measured value decrease as a result of the motion? In a second scenario, imagine a person with a...
Scalar and vector potentials in Coulomb gauge Assume Coulomb gauge so that $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A}=0.\tag{1}$$ The scalar potential ##\phi## is described by Poisson's equation $$\nabla^2 \phi = -\frac{\rho}{\varepsilon_0}\tag{2}$$ which has the instantaneous general solution given by $$\phi(\mathbf{r},t)=\frac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\int \frac{\rho(\mathbf{r}',t)}{|\mathbf{r}-\mathbf{r}'|}d^3r'.\tag{3}$$ In Coulomb gauge the vector potential ##\mathbf{A}## is given by...
Thread 'Does Poisson's equation hold due to vector potential cancellation?'
Imagine that two charged particles, with charge ##+q##, start at the origin and then move apart symmetrically on the ##+y## and ##-y## axes due to their electrostatic repulsion. The ##y##-component of the retarded Liénard-Wiechert vector potential at a point along the ##x##-axis due to the two charges is $$ \begin{eqnarray*} A_y&=&\frac{q\,[\dot{y}]_{\mathrm{ret}}}{4\pi\varepsilon_0 c^2[(x^2+y^2)^{1/2}+y\dot{y}/c]_{\mathrm{ret}}}\tag{1}\\...
Back
Top