Ideal gas partial differential calculus

CyberShot
Messages
133
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


Use partial differential calculus to show that if 3 quantities p, V, T are related to each other by some
unknown but smooth (which means all derivatives are well defined) equation of state f (P, V, T ) = 0. Then the
partial derivatives must satisfy the relation∂p/∂T = - (∂V /∂T ) / ( (∂V /∂p) )

Homework Equations



Not sure any would help in this case.

The Attempt at a Solution



I'm not even sure where to start since I haven't a proper understanding of the problem.

If p, V, and T are related then

how does f (P, V, T ) = 0 help?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This requires some playing around with the multivariable chain rule and the implicit function theorem.
 
I'll try and provide more of a start.

The equation of state f \left( P , V , T \right) = 0 picks out a surface in \left( P , V , T \right) space, and the implicit function theorem says that (locally) on this surface, any of the three variables can be written as a function of the other two, e.g., P = P \left( V , T \right). Define a new (related) function
\tilde{f} \left( V , T \right) = f \left( P \left( V , T \right) , V , T \right)
Use this and the chain rule to find \partial \tilde{f} / \partial T.

This is just a start.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top