Impossible problem? [Varibles ONLY]

  • Thread starter Thread starter woox
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Impossible
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a user seeking help with a challenging problem involving only variables, expressing frustration after completing 34 similar problems. Respondents emphasize the importance of creating a free body diagram as a crucial first step in solving statics problems. They encourage the user to attempt the problem independently before seeking assistance. The community stresses that they are willing to provide guidance but will not solve the problem outright. Engaging with the problem actively is essential for finding a solution.
woox
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
Ok this problem is driving me INSANE, I did the other 34 this is my last one and I just need help on it because my brain locks up with solid only variables. The problem is below. I would appreciate steps shown to get final answer.

2.jpg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
woox said:
Ok this problem is driving me INSANE, I did the other 34 this is my last one and I just need help on it because my brain locks up with solid only variables. The problem is below. I would appreciate steps shown to get final answer.

2.jpg
Thank you for including the diagram, but some effort on your behalf is required before anyone here will help. No one is going to do the question for you.
 
Any statics problem should begin with a free body diagram. Once that is done the solution usually comes easily. If you have done one you can post it for comments.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top