Finding Angular Velocity and Center of Mass Velocity for a Free Rotating Rod

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the angular velocity (ω) and the center of mass velocity (v0) for a free rotating rod after an impulse (J) is applied. The moment of inertia for the rod is given as I = ml²/12, and the angular momentum relation is used to derive ω as ω = (12dJ)/(ml²). For v0, it is determined using the impulse-momentum theorem as v0 = J/m, which raises questions about its independence from the point of impulse application. The participants clarify that while it seems counterintuitive, the relationship holds true due to the dynamics of momentum transfer. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the mechanics behind impulse and motion in rigid bodies.
physicsisgreat
Messages
10
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


I have a rod of mass m and length l on a table without any kind of friction. I give it an impulse J in any point of distance d from the center of the rod, parallel to the table and perpendicular to the rod.
Find the angular velocity ω and the velocity of the center of mass v0.

Homework Equations


Moment of inertia of the rod rotating around its center: I = m l2 / 12
L = I · ω

The Attempt at a Solution


From the impulse theorem:
J = ΔP = P'
I can calculate ω from the angular momentum relations:
L = d x J = I · ω
ω = d J / I = 12 d J / (m l2),
which is 0 if I hit the rod on its center and max if I hit it on d = l/2.
Now I fail to calculate v0 :P

Thank you in advance :)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello P.i.G., welcome to PF :)

Your relevant equation needs one or two colleagues: currently v0 doesn't feature there, ##\omega## doesn't, etc.

Your relevant equation also needs improvement. There is a factor missing.
 
Should you not apply a couple of equal torques (one clock and one anti-clock) to stop any motion of the centre of mass?
 
dean barry said:
Should you not apply a couple of equal torques (one clock and one anti-clock) to stop any motion of the centre of mass?
Not a good idea. 1. It doesn't work. 2. There is nothing that can be considered a cause for these ##\tau##. 3. The center of mass is not "stopped"
 
Hi, I edited my post adding the factor missing and an equation about ω (which I actually used later in my attempt at a solution).
I cannot give another equation about v0 though, as it is exactly what I am looking for! :)
 
Last edited:
Mmh, following the impulse-momentum theorem
J = ΔP
I would say that
v0 = J / m.

At the same time I wonder: can this be true? Can the velocity of the center of mass of the rod be independent from the point in which the impulse is applied?
 
physicsisgreat said:
Mmh, following the impulse-momentum theorem
J = ΔP
I would say that
v0 = J / m.

At the same time I wonder: can this be true? Can the velocity of the center of mass of the rod be independent from the point in which the impulse is applied?
Yes, it's correct. It feels wrong, until you realize that to impart the same impulse further from the centre of mass of the rod you have to 'work' harder. The rod tends to swing out of the way, so takes less momentum off the impacting object. To achieve the same imparted momentum the impacting object has to start with more momentum.
 
  • Like
Likes physicsisgreat
Thank you very much haruspex! :)
 
Back
Top