Increment of capacitance of conductor

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the change in capacitance when a conductor is inserted between the plates of a parallel plate capacitor. The derived formula for the increase in capacitance is ΔC = -Aε0t/σd(d-t), which differs from the textbook answer by a negative sign. The user is uncertain about the source of this discrepancy and seeks clarification on the integration steps and the physical reasoning behind the increase in capacitance. Additionally, the user notes that capacitance should be a positive quantity, prompting questions about the sign of the electric field in the context of the problem. Understanding these concepts is crucial for resolving the confusion regarding the calculations.
Richardbryant
Messages
24
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A Sheet of conductor of thickness t and parallel faces of cross-sectional area >=A is inserted between the plates of the capacitor of a parallel plate conductor. Show that the capacitance increased by ΔC= ε0tA/d(d-t)

Homework Equations


σ,ε0,Δ

The Attempt at a Solution


Denote Co be the initial capacitance, C' be the final capacitance.
Formula used: C=Q/V E=σ/ε0
First,Co Q/Vo, Vo=- ∫E.ds (range from 0->d) , thus the result is -σd/ε0 , Co=-Qε0/σd
Similarly, Q/V' V= - ∫E.ds (range from 0->d-t) , thus the result is -σ(d-t)/ε0 , C'=-Qε0/σ(d-t)
By answer of the two equation ΔC= C'-Co=-Qε0/σ[1/(d-t)-1/d]=-Qε0t/σd(d-t)

after substituting Q=σA then ΔC=-Aε0t/σd(d-t)
As seen, my answer is differing from the books answer by a negative sign, can anyone tell me from which step(s) i proceed wrong, there for arrive to a wrong answer.
Secondly, would anyone offer mea physical explanation of inscribing a conductor which can increase the capacitance? ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I notice there something wrong when i post this thread, therefore i shall rewrite it starting from The attempt at a solution
Denote Co be the initial capacitance, C' be the final capacitance.
Formula used: C=Q/V E=σ/ε0
First,Co Q/Vo, Vo=- ∫E.ds (range from 0->d) , thus the result is -σd/ε0 , Co=-Qε0/σd
Similarly, Q/V' V= - ∫E.ds (range from 0->d-t) , thus the result is -σ(d-t)/ε0 , C'=-Qε0/σ(d-t)

By subtraction and substituting Q=σA , the answer a get has a negative sign differ from solution.
 
I notice there something wrong when i post this thread, therefore i shall rewrite it starting from The attempt at a solution
Denote Co be the initial capacitance, C' be the final capacitance.
Formula used: C=Q/V E=σ/ε0
First,Co Q/Vo, Vo=- ∫E.ds (range from 0->d) , thus the result is -σd/ε0 , Co=-Qε0/σd
Similarly, Q/V' V= - ∫E.ds (range from 0->d-t) , thus the result is -σ(d-t)/ε0 , C'=-Qε0/σ(d-t)

Thus, substitute Q=σA and subtract the two answer I got, the solution I obtained is - ε0ta/d(d-t)

Which differ from the textbook by a negative sign.
 
Richardbryant said:
I notice there something wrong when i post this thread, therefore i shall rewrite it starting from The attempt at a solution
Denote Co be the initial capacitance, C' be the final capacitance.
Formula used: C=Q/V E=σ/ε0
First,Co Q/Vo, Vo=- ∫E.ds (range from 0->d) , thus the result is -σd/ε0 , Co=-Qε0/σd
Similarly, Q/V' V= - ∫E.ds (range from 0->d-t) , thus the result is -σ(d-t)/ε0 , C'=-Qε0/σ(d-t)

Thus, substitute Q=σA and subtract the two answer I got, the solution I obtained is - ε0ta/d(d-t)

Which differ from the textbook by a negative sign.
The capacitance is supposed to be a positive quantity.
The electric field lines start from positive charges and end in negative ones. Assuming the upper plate is positive, and you integrate the electric field from from 0 to t, what is the sign of E?
upload_2017-8-30_23-42-35.png
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top