Infinite Atwood Machine (Morin Problem 3.3)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving the infinite Atwood machine problem, where a string passes over pulleys with equal masses. The user attempts to derive the acceleration of the top mass using Newton's second law but initially arrives at an incorrect conclusion of a = g, while the solution indicates a = g/2. Confusion arises regarding the tension in the string, with clarifications needed on its definition and application in the equations. The user is encouraged to consider a finite version of the problem for better insight. The thread highlights the challenges of understanding the dynamics of an infinite system and the importance of correctly applying physical principles.
L = K - U
Messages
4
Reaction score
1
I could've peeked at the solution manual and end with it at that. However, I'm trying to change this nasty habit and solve this problem myself. I might be too ambitious. Here goes.

Homework Statement


Consider the infinite Atwood's machine shown. A string passes over each pulley, with one end attached to a mass and the other end attached to another pulley. All the masses are equal to m, and all the pulleys and strings are massless. The masses are held fixed and then simultaneously released. What is the acceleration of the top mass? (You may define this infinite system as follows. Consider it to be made of N pulleys, with a nonzero mass replacing what would have been the (N+1)th pulley. Then take the limit as N \rightarrow \infty)
56357689e9.d45788dbfe.ww1Xpo.jpg

Homework Equations


Newton's Second Law : \sum \mathbf{F} = m\mathbf{a}

The Attempt at a Solution


Taking the upward direction to be positive, I started with Newton's Second law of motion for the Nth mass
\dfrac{T}{N} - mg = ma_N.
With this equation, I can quickly see that the mass at infinity would have an acceleration downwards of magnitude g and the tension in the string will be zero.

I then tried to reduce the problem to a single atwood machine with mass m on the left and (N - 1)m on the right. Solving using Newton's Laws and 'Conservation of string', I ended with
a = \bigg(1 - \dfrac{2}{N} \bigg)g
taking the limit as N approches infinity, I will get an acceleration upwards with a = g. However, the solution says (I'm only peeking at the answer, I swear.) that the correct answer is a = \dfrac{g}{2}

My last resort is to return to the equation of motion for the Nth mass and try to find the relationship between all of the masses. I used a bunch of 'Conservation of Strings' and ended up with an equation that looks like it should mean something.
a^\prime_N = a_N + \sum_{i = 1}^{N-1} 2^{(N-1) - i}a_i
with a^\prime_N being the acceleration of the Nth mass in the frame accelerating downwards. From here, I tried to take the limit of the sum above but It blows up to infinity.

I'm truly stuck at this one and I need some insight on this problem.
Thanks in advance.
 
  • Like
Likes DuckAmuck
Physics news on Phys.org
L = K - U said:
Taking the upward direction to be positive, I started with Newton's Second law of motion for the Nth mass
T/N−mg=maN
What is T here? If it is the tension in the string attached to the Nth mass, why isn't it TN-mg=maN? Or is that what you meant?
 
haruspex said:
What is T here? If it is the tension in the string attached to the Nth mass, why isn't it TN-mg=maN? Or is that what you meant?

I intended for T to be the tension in the string attached to the first mass. Since the pulley is light, the tension should halve along each successful mass.

I must have typed it wrong in the original post, sorry there.
 
L = K - U said:
reduce the problem to a single atwood machine with mass m on the left and (N - 1)m on the right.
It is not clear to me that this has any relevance. The accelerations will not look like or approximate the problem at hand. The hint suggests just taking a finite version of the problem, so N lots of m, over separate pulleys as shown, on the left and one mass m on the right.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top