Initial electric field strength

AI Thread Summary
The initial electric field strength between oppositely charged parallel plates is 3.0 X 10^3 N/C. When half the charge is removed and the plate separation decreases from 12 mm to 8 mm, the expected electric field strength calculation leads to confusion. The correct approach involves using the surface charge density formula, E = n/ε₀, rather than the point charge equation. The final calculated electric field strength is 1.5 X 10^3 N/C, highlighting the importance of using the appropriate equations for parallel plate capacitors. Understanding the distinction between point charge and parallel plate equations is crucial for accurate calculations.
ralph344
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The initial electric field strength between oppositely charged parallel plates is 3.0 X 10^3 N/C, what would the electric field strength become if half of the charge were removed from each plate and the separation of the plates were changed from 12 mm to 8 mm?

Homework Equations


E= kq/r^2
k=9.0 X 10^9


The Attempt at a Solution


I used proportions.
Since the formula is E=kq/r^2, i rearranged the formula to Er^2/q = k. Since the k value is going to stay constant for both.
Er^2/q = Er^2/q
[(3.0 X 10^3)(0.012)^2]/q=[E(0.008)^2]/[0.5q]
E= 3.5 X 10^3 N/C
But the answer is 1.5 X 10^3 N/C...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The electric field equation you state is for a point charge. ( and other limited cases)
 
But that's the only equation taught in this section... there is no other equations... anymore hints?
 
hey! i solved your problem! the equation you are using is that of a point charge like robb said. the electric field strength in a parallel plate capacitor is given by E=n/epsilon zero. n is the surface charge density of the plates which are equal in magnitude. the surface charge density is simply the amount charge on the plates divided by its surface area.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top