Integral of solids with linearly decreasing charge density

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the total charge in solids with a linearly decreasing charge density, specifically for a rectangular prism and a sphere. The charge density function, ρ(x), is derived from the maximum charge density, λ, and height, h, allowing for integration over the volume. For the rectangular prism, the area function A(x) remains constant, while for the sphere, it varies based on the area of a disc. Participants emphasize the importance of correctly setting up the integrals to account for the variable charge density with height. The final expressions for charge can be rearranged to reveal insights related to λ and the volume of the solids.
Aesteus
Messages
17
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Calculate the total charge embodied in a solid with charge density that decreases linearly with height from a value of λ at the bottom to 0 at the top.
Solve for a rectangular prism and a sphere.

Homework Equations



∫∫∫ρdxdydz
∫∫∫pr^2sinθdrdθd∅

The Attempt at a Solution



For a rectangular prism, I integrated from 0 to x,y for dx,dy and lambda to 0 for dz. I ended up with Q=x*y*ρ*some function of λ. However, something seems off about this approach, because the charge at any x and y varies with height.

I think if I can get the logic behind the prism, I'll be able to understand the sphere, but any other advice would be helpful.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Anyone have an idea?
 
The charge enclosed in an element of height dx is given by \rho(x)A(x)dx where \rho(x) is a function that expresses the volume-charge density at a given height x from the base. A(x) denotes the area function, i.e. the cross-sectional area of a slice taken at height x from the base. x varies from 0 to h, the height of the figure.

Work out an expression for \rho(x) in terms of \lambda, h and x first (easy, since it's a linear relationship) - this applies to both figures. Then it's just a matter of evaluating the integral in each case between the bounds of 0 and h. For the rectangular prism (which is a cuboid), A(x) is a constant. For the sphere, A(x) follows the area of a disc. (For the sphere, h = 2R, where R is the radius).

After you get the final expression, you should be able to rearrange to express it in terms of \lambda and the volume V alone. When you do this, you will discover an interesting insight.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top