Integral of x^-2 b/w -1 & 1: -2 Explained

  • Thread starter Thread starter Zoe-b
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integration
Zoe-b
Messages
91
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The integral of 1/(x^2) between -1 and 1 comes to -2. How is this possible when the graph is always above the x-axis?

3. The Attempt at a Solution
the integral of x^(-2) = -x^(-1) + c
in this range you get (-1/1 - 1/1) which does indeed equal 2.
My original solution was to say that since the graph is not continuous in this range it makes no sense to try to find the integral (which should be infinite surely?). Is there more to it than this?
Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Short answer: the integral of 1/x^2 between -1 and 1 does NOT "come to -2". In fact, 1/x^2 is not differentiable between -1 and 1 because of the infinite discontinuity at 0. Specifically, you cannot just find the anti-derivative and evaluate at -1 and 1.

You could try to evaluate it using the definition of "improper integrals":
\int_{-1}^1 \frac{1}{x^2} dx= \int_{-1}^{-\alpha}\frac{1}{x^2}dx+ \int_\beta^1 \frac{1}{x^2}dx
and then take the limits as \alpha and \beta go to 0independently.
The two integrals are
-\frac{1}{x}\left|_{-1}^{-\alpha}+ \frac{1}{x}\right|_{\beta}^1= \frac{1}{\alpha}- 1- 1+ \frac{1}{\beta}
but that limit does not exist as \alpha and \beta go to 0 independently
.
If you were to assume that \alpha= \beta you would be calcuating the "Cauchy Principle Value"- those two fractions would cancel and you would get "-2". If the integral itself exists, then the Cauchy Principle Value but if the integral does not exist, as here, you get the kind of ridiculous result you cite.
 
Ok that's fine, pretty much what I thought (though hadn't thought through the limits thing)
Thank you
 
HallsofIvy said:
Short answer: the integral of 1/x^2 between -1 and 1 does NOT "come to -2". In fact, 1/x^2 is not differentiable between -1 and 1 because of the infinite discontinuity at 0. Specifically, you cannot just find the anti-derivative and evaluate at -1 and 1.

You could try to evaluate it using the definition of "improper integrals":
\int_{-1}^1 \frac{1}{x^2} dx= \int_{-1}^{-\alpha}\frac{1}{x^2}dx+ \int_\beta^1 \frac{1}{x^2}dx
and then take the limits as \alpha and \beta go to 0independently.
The two integrals are
-\frac{1}{x}\left|_{-1}^{-\alpha}+ \frac{1}{x}\right|_{\beta}^1= \frac{1}{\alpha}- 1- 1+ \frac{1}{\beta}
but that limit does not exist as \alpha and \beta go to 0 independently
.

If you were to assume that \alpha= \beta you would be calcuating the "Cauchy Principle Value"- those two fractions would cancel and you would get "-2".
. Actually, they wouldn't cancel; they both go to \infty. If the integrand was odd they would have cancelled.
If the integral itself exists, then the Cauchy Principle Value but if the integral does not exist, as here, you get the kind of ridiculous result you cite.
 
Prove $$\int\limits_0^{\sqrt2/4}\frac{1}{\sqrt{x-x^2}}\arcsin\sqrt{\frac{(x-1)\left(x-1+x\sqrt{9-16x}\right)}{1-2x}} \, \mathrm dx = \frac{\pi^2}{8}.$$ Let $$I = \int\limits_0^{\sqrt 2 / 4}\frac{1}{\sqrt{x-x^2}}\arcsin\sqrt{\frac{(x-1)\left(x-1+x\sqrt{9-16x}\right)}{1-2x}} \, \mathrm dx. \tag{1}$$ The representation integral of ##\arcsin## is $$\arcsin u = \int\limits_{0}^{1} \frac{\mathrm dt}{\sqrt{1-t^2}}, \qquad 0 \leqslant u \leqslant 1.$$ Plugging identity above into ##(1)## with ##u...
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top