Integrating a vector (Electromagnetism)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around finding the magnetic field \textbf{B} given the electric field \textbf{E}(z,t) = E_{0}cos(kz+ωt)\textbf{i}. The curl of \textbf{E} is calculated, leading to the expression for \frac{\partial\textbf{B}}{\partial t}. There is uncertainty regarding the integration process and whether the functions f(z) and g(z) can be set to zero, with clarification that these can be incorporated into an arbitrary constant vector \textbf{c}. The conversation also touches on applying Faraday's Law and Gauss's Law to conclude that the static magnetic field \textbf{B}_0 must vanish at infinity, leading to the standard plane-wave solution. The integration and assumptions ultimately guide the derivation of the magnetic field in the context of electromagnetism.
raggle
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Given \textbf{E}(z,t) = E_{0}cos(kz+ωt)\textbf{i}
Find B

Homework Equations



∇ x E = -\frac{\partial\textbf{B}}{\partial t}

The Attempt at a Solution



Taking the curl of \textbf{E} gives (0, -ksin(kz+\omega t), 0)
so
\frac{\partial\textbf{B}}{\partial t} = (0,ksin(kz+\omega t),0)

I'm not too confident integrating this, I got
\textbf{B} = (f(z),-\frac{k}{\omega}cos(kz+\omega t), g(z)) + \textbf{c}
where c is a constant of integration.

Is this right? The next part of the question asks for the poynting vector and it seems like a lot of work calculating \textbf{E} \times \textbf{B} , would i be allowed to set f = g = 0?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Where did you get this "f(z)" and "g(z)"? The "constant" of integration is the vector c you have added.
 
Yeah that's what I'm confused about.
My reasoning is that I have \frac{\partial \textbf{B}}{\partial t} in terms of \textbf{E}, and since \textbf{E} is a function of z and t I get the functions of z from partially integrating wrt t.
Should they be 0?
 
Oh wait I think i just got it.
I can put those functions of z into the arbitrary constant vector c can't I?

Thanks!
 
From the Faraday Law alone, we can in fact only conclude that
\vec{B}(t,\vec{r})=-E_0 \frac{k}{\omega} \cos(\omega t+k z)+\vec{B}_0(\vec{r})
where \vec{B}_0 is an arbitrary static magnetic field.

From Gauss's Law for the magentic field we find
\vec{\nabla} \cdot \vec{B}=\vec{\nabla} \cdot \vec{B}_0=0.

From the Maxwell-Ampere Law, assuming that there are no currents, we get
\partial_t \vec{E}=\vec{\nabla} \times \vec{B} \; \Rightarrow \; \vec{\nabla} \times \vec{B}_0=0.
Thus static magnetic field \vec{B}_0 is both source and vortex free. Thus if it should vanish at inifinity, it must be 0.

From these additional assumptions we get the usual plane-wave solution.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top