Integration constants, gravitational potential of sphere

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the gravitational potential of a hollow sphere at a point P, considering two scenarios: when the distance from the center of the sphere to point P (r) is greater than the radius of the sphere (R) and when r is less than R. Participants explore the implications of their integral setup and the behavior of gravitational potential in these scenarios.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the limits of integration for the gravitational potential integral in both scenarios, questioning the assumptions about the constants and the nature of the potential inside the sphere. There is also exploration of the gravitational effects of rings of mass and how to account for their contributions to the potential.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing insights and questioning each other's reasoning. Some guidance has been offered regarding the need to consider vector components and the implications of integrating over the mass distribution of the sphere. There is recognition of the complexities involved in calculating the gravitational potential, particularly in relation to the assumptions made about the mass distribution.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the complexities of gravitational potential, particularly in the context of hollow versus solid spheres, and are addressing the need to consider the geometry of the problem. There are references to potential assumptions that may need to be revisited, particularly regarding the integration limits and the treatment of mass elements.

Vir
Messages
18
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


So I'm calculating the gravitational potential of a sphere at at point P. R = radius of sphere, r = distance from center of sphere to point P. I'm looking at two scenarios; r > R (1) and r < R (2). So I have the following integral:

\begin{equation} V(r) = \int \frac{-GM}{Rr} ds
\end{equation}

The Attempt at a Solution


Now, for (1) I integrate from r-R to r+R. However for (2) I'm thinking I have to integrate from -(R-r) to R+r, but this gives me the same constants as in (1). To my understanding the potential is supposed to be constant for all r < R, but then my constants are giving me the wrong answer.

If I remove the - and integrate from R-r to R+r I get a correct answer, but this makes no sense to me. That would mean I was integrating from the center of the sphere out to the edge, effectively ignoring half of the sphere? What am I missing?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Vir said:

Homework Statement


So I'm calculating the gravitational potential of a sphere at at point P. R = radius of sphere, r = distance from center of sphere to point P. I'm looking at two scenarios; r > R (1) and r < R (2). So I have the following integral:

\begin{equation} V(r) = \int \frac{-GM}{Rr} ds
\end{equation}

The Attempt at a Solution


Now, for (1) I integrate from r-R to r+R. However for (2) I'm thinking I have to integrate from -(R-r) to R+r, but this gives me the same constants as in (1). To my understanding the potential is supposed to be constant for all r < R, but then my constants are giving me the wrong answer.

If I remove the - and integrate from R-r to R+r I get a correct answer, but this makes no sense to me. That would mean I was integrating from the center of the sphere out to the edge, effectively ignoring half of the sphere? What am I missing?

I'm confused about what you are trying to do. ##\frac{-GM}{r}## is the gravitational potential for a solid sphere at a point outside the sphere, a distance r from the centre.

What are you trying to calculate?
 
PeroK said:
What are you trying to calculate?

I'm trying to arrive at the gravitational potential at a distance r < radius of sphere(R). The integral is

\begin{equation}
V(r<R) = \int \frac{-GM}{2rR}ds,
\end{equation}

but I'm not sure how to select my integration limits.
 
Is this a hollow sphere? And are you trying to integrate over a surface?
 
Yes, a hollow sphere. I'm integrating small circles of the surface of the sphere. I guess this image describes it well.
500px-Shell-diag-1.png
 
That's a point r outside the sphere. In that diagram, you first need to work out the gravitational potential of the ring marked in blue. So you're going to need to take θ into account and calculate dM as well.
 
Ok. So
\begin{equation}
dV(r<R) = \frac{-GdM}{S}
\end{equation}

\begin{equation}
dM = \frac{M}{4\pi R^2}d \theta R Sin \theta R 2 \pi
\end{equation}

\begin{equation}
dM = \frac{M}{2}Sin \theta d \theta
\end{equation}

\begin{equation}
S = \sqrt{R^2+r^2-2Rr Cos \theta}
\end{equation}

\begin{equation}
\frac{dS}{d \theta} = \frac{Rr Sin \theta}{S}
\end{equation}

Inserting in dV(r<R):

\begin{equation}
dV(r<R) = \frac{-GM Sin \theta S ds}{2SRr Sin \theta}
\end{equation}

\begin{equation}
dV(r<R) = \frac{-GM}{2Rr} ds
\end{equation}

\begin{equation}
V(r<R) = \int \frac{-GM}{2Rr} ds
\end{equation}

Is that right?
 
Not quite. If you think in terms of the force exerted by the ring, what is the direction of the force?
 
When the ring is to the right of P the force points left, and vice versa.
 
  • #10
You need to think more carefully. Remember that force is a vector.
 
  • #11
Yea, ok. I was thinking since each point on the circle has a point on the opposite side where the perpendicular component of the forces would cancel out the net force would be parallell to the axis through the center of the circle and P. Not so?
 
  • #12
Yes, the perpendicular forces cancel. But what about the magnitude of the remaining force?
 
  • #13
That would depend on the mass at P right? In any case it's
\begin{equation}
F = -\frac{GMm}{(r-R Cos \theta)}
\end{equation}
 
  • #14
Take a look again at your diagram and make s a vector. That's the direction of the force. So, you have a "vertical" component and a "horizontal" component. The magnitude of the horizontal component is not the magnitude of the full force.
 
  • #15
Then I don't know. You asked about the magnitude of the remaining force, isn't that the horizontal component of the total force?
 
  • #16
Vir said:
Then I don't know. You asked about the magnitude of the remaining force, isn't that the horizontal component of the total force?
Yes, but the vertical force is ##Fsin(φ)## and the horizotal force is ##Fcos(φ)##
 
  • #17
Right. So what do I do with this?
 
  • #18
Vir said:
Right. So what do I do with this?

You need to factor ##cos(φ)## into your equation. That's all your missing, I think.
 
  • #19
I don't know. My integral gives me the right answer for R>r:
\begin{equation}
V(r>R) = \frac{-GM}{2rR} \int_{r-R}^{r+R} ds
\end{equation}

Simplifies to:

\begin{equation}
V(r>R) = \frac{-GM}{r}
\end{equation}

I think the point is that when r<R then the rings both to the left and right of P have a positive distance to P, since the potential is supposed to be negative. I guess one has to think more in terms of polar coordinates? Thus, when r<R you have to integrate from R-r(closest side of sphere) to R+r(far side). This gives

\begin{equation}
V(r<R) = \frac{-GM}{2rR} \int_{R-r}^{R+r} ds
\end{equation}

Simplifies:

\begin{equation}
V(r<R) = \frac{-GM}{R}
\end{equation}
 
  • #20
I think you've got two mistakes cancelling out for the problem outside the sphere. But, they won't cancel inside the sphere.

You've got ##dV = -GdM/S## but that assumes that all the mass in the ring is concentrated at one point a distance S. You need to take cos(φ) into account. The potential must be:

##dV = (-GdM/S)cos(φ)##

If you imagine being very close to the ring, then there would be almost no potential. In fact, when φ = π/2, the potential will be zero.
 
  • #21
So I checked my book:
image082.gif

The potential dV(x) at P from dM, that is now a small part of the ring, at distance S is given by:

\begin{equation}
dV(x) = \frac{-GdM}{S}
\end{equation}

\begin{equation}
dM = \frac{M}{2 \pi R}Rd \theta
\end{equation}

So

\begin{equation}
V(x) = \frac{-GM}{2 \pi S}\int_0^{2 \pi}d \theta = \frac{-GM}{S}
\end{equation}

So when S = R the potential is not zero, it's just the lowest possible value for any point on the axis through the ring's center. However the gravitational field will be zero, since g(0) = -∇V(0) = 0.

I think you are right about the cancelling though. Gravitational potential doesn't cancel out. The potential is exactly the same for every dM on the ring so the potential from the ring is just the sum of potential from all the dMs. So for the hollow sphere the gravitational potential is just the sum of the potential from all the rings in the sphere. So since the inside of a sphere is a equipotential region(source: wikipedia) V = constant for any point inside the sphere. I believe this is correct.

Thanks for the help!
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
764
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
6K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K