Integration constants, gravitational potential of sphere

In summary, the student is trying to calculate the gravitational potential at a distance r < radius of sphere(R), but is not sure how to select the integration limits.
  • #1
Vir
18
0

Homework Statement


So I'm calculating the gravitational potential of a sphere at at point P. R = radius of sphere, r = distance from center of sphere to point P. I'm looking at two scenarios; r > R (1) and r < R (2). So I have the following integral:

\begin{equation} V(r) = \int \frac{-GM}{Rr} ds
\end{equation}

The Attempt at a Solution


Now, for (1) I integrate from r-R to r+R. However for (2) I'm thinking I have to integrate from -(R-r) to R+r, but this gives me the same constants as in (1). To my understanding the potential is supposed to be constant for all r < R, but then my constants are giving me the wrong answer.

If I remove the - and integrate from R-r to R+r I get a correct answer, but this makes no sense to me. That would mean I was integrating from the center of the sphere out to the edge, effectively ignoring half of the sphere? What am I missing?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Vir said:

Homework Statement


So I'm calculating the gravitational potential of a sphere at at point P. R = radius of sphere, r = distance from center of sphere to point P. I'm looking at two scenarios; r > R (1) and r < R (2). So I have the following integral:

\begin{equation} V(r) = \int \frac{-GM}{Rr} ds
\end{equation}

The Attempt at a Solution


Now, for (1) I integrate from r-R to r+R. However for (2) I'm thinking I have to integrate from -(R-r) to R+r, but this gives me the same constants as in (1). To my understanding the potential is supposed to be constant for all r < R, but then my constants are giving me the wrong answer.

If I remove the - and integrate from R-r to R+r I get a correct answer, but this makes no sense to me. That would mean I was integrating from the center of the sphere out to the edge, effectively ignoring half of the sphere? What am I missing?

I'm confused about what you are trying to do. ##\frac{-GM}{r}## is the gravitational potential for a solid sphere at a point outside the sphere, a distance r from the centre.

What are you trying to calculate?
 
  • #3
PeroK said:
What are you trying to calculate?

I'm trying to arrive at the gravitational potential at a distance r < radius of sphere(R). The integral is

\begin{equation}
V(r<R) = \int \frac{-GM}{2rR}ds,
\end{equation}

but I'm not sure how to select my integration limits.
 
  • #4
Is this a hollow sphere? And are you trying to integrate over a surface?
 
  • #5
Yes, a hollow sphere. I'm integrating small circles of the surface of the sphere. I guess this image describes it well.
500px-Shell-diag-1.png
 
  • #6
That's a point r outside the sphere. In that diagram, you first need to work out the gravitational potential of the ring marked in blue. So you're going to need to take θ into account and calculate dM as well.
 
  • #7
Ok. So
\begin{equation}
dV(r<R) = \frac{-GdM}{S}
\end{equation}

\begin{equation}
dM = \frac{M}{4\pi R^2}d \theta R Sin \theta R 2 \pi
\end{equation}

\begin{equation}
dM = \frac{M}{2}Sin \theta d \theta
\end{equation}

\begin{equation}
S = \sqrt{R^2+r^2-2Rr Cos \theta}
\end{equation}

\begin{equation}
\frac{dS}{d \theta} = \frac{Rr Sin \theta}{S}
\end{equation}

Inserting in dV(r<R):

\begin{equation}
dV(r<R) = \frac{-GM Sin \theta S ds}{2SRr Sin \theta}
\end{equation}

\begin{equation}
dV(r<R) = \frac{-GM}{2Rr} ds
\end{equation}

\begin{equation}
V(r<R) = \int \frac{-GM}{2Rr} ds
\end{equation}

Is that right?
 
  • #8
Not quite. If you think in terms of the force exerted by the ring, what is the direction of the force?
 
  • #9
When the ring is to the right of P the force points left, and vice versa.
 
  • #10
You need to think more carefully. Remember that force is a vector.
 
  • #11
Yea, ok. I was thinking since each point on the circle has a point on the opposite side where the perpendicular component of the forces would cancel out the net force would be parallell to the axis through the center of the circle and P. Not so?
 
  • #12
Yes, the perpendicular forces cancel. But what about the magnitude of the remaining force?
 
  • #13
That would depend on the mass at P right? In any case it's
\begin{equation}
F = -\frac{GMm}{(r-R Cos \theta)}
\end{equation}
 
  • #14
Take a look again at your diagram and make s a vector. That's the direction of the force. So, you have a "vertical" component and a "horizontal" component. The magnitude of the horizontal component is not the magnitude of the full force.
 
  • #15
Then I don't know. You asked about the magnitude of the remaining force, isn't that the horizontal component of the total force?
 
  • #16
Vir said:
Then I don't know. You asked about the magnitude of the remaining force, isn't that the horizontal component of the total force?
Yes, but the vertical force is ##Fsin(φ)## and the horizotal force is ##Fcos(φ)##
 
  • #17
Right. So what do I do with this?
 
  • #18
Vir said:
Right. So what do I do with this?

You need to factor ##cos(φ)## into your equation. That's all your missing, I think.
 
  • #19
I don't know. My integral gives me the right answer for R>r:
\begin{equation}
V(r>R) = \frac{-GM}{2rR} \int_{r-R}^{r+R} ds
\end{equation}

Simplifies to:

\begin{equation}
V(r>R) = \frac{-GM}{r}
\end{equation}

I think the point is that when r<R then the rings both to the left and right of P have a positive distance to P, since the potential is supposed to be negative. I guess one has to think more in terms of polar coordinates? Thus, when r<R you have to integrate from R-r(closest side of sphere) to R+r(far side). This gives

\begin{equation}
V(r<R) = \frac{-GM}{2rR} \int_{R-r}^{R+r} ds
\end{equation}

Simplifies:

\begin{equation}
V(r<R) = \frac{-GM}{R}
\end{equation}
 
  • #20
I think you've got two mistakes cancelling out for the problem outside the sphere. But, they won't cancel inside the sphere.

You've got ##dV = -GdM/S## but that assumes that all the mass in the ring is concentrated at one point a distance S. You need to take cos(φ) into account. The potential must be:

##dV = (-GdM/S)cos(φ)##

If you imagine being very close to the ring, then there would be almost no potential. In fact, when φ = π/2, the potential will be zero.
 
  • #21
So I checked my book:
image082.gif

The potential dV(x) at P from dM, that is now a small part of the ring, at distance S is given by:

\begin{equation}
dV(x) = \frac{-GdM}{S}
\end{equation}

\begin{equation}
dM = \frac{M}{2 \pi R}Rd \theta
\end{equation}

So

\begin{equation}
V(x) = \frac{-GM}{2 \pi S}\int_0^{2 \pi}d \theta = \frac{-GM}{S}
\end{equation}

So when S = R the potential is not zero, it's just the lowest possible value for any point on the axis through the ring's center. However the gravitational field will be zero, since g(0) = -∇V(0) = 0.

I think you are right about the cancelling though. Gravitational potential doesn't cancel out. The potential is exactly the same for every dM on the ring so the potential from the ring is just the sum of potential from all the dMs. So for the hollow sphere the gravitational potential is just the sum of the potential from all the rings in the sphere. So since the inside of a sphere is a equipotential region(source: wikipedia) V = constant for any point inside the sphere. I believe this is correct.

Thanks for the help!
 
Last edited:

1. What are integration constants and why are they important in calculating the gravitational potential of a sphere?

Integration constants are arbitrary constants that arise during the process of integration. They are important in calculating the gravitational potential of a sphere because they represent the initial conditions of the system and help determine the specific solution to the differential equation governing the gravitational potential.

2. How do integration constants affect the gravitational potential of a sphere?

The values of the integration constants directly affect the specific solution of the gravitational potential equation, which in turn determines the overall shape and behavior of the potential. Therefore, changing the integration constants can significantly alter the gravitational potential of a sphere.

3. Can integration constants be negative or complex numbers?

Yes, integration constants can take on any real or complex value. The specific values of the integration constants depend on the specific problem being solved and the initial conditions of the system.

4. How do you determine the integration constants for a given problem?

The values of the integration constants can be determined by solving the differential equation governing the gravitational potential of a sphere using the given initial conditions. This can be done analytically or numerically using appropriate techniques and tools.

5. Can the gravitational potential of a sphere be calculated without considering integration constants?

No, the integration constants are essential in calculating the gravitational potential of a sphere. Without them, the specific solution to the differential equation cannot be determined, and the overall potential cannot be accurately calculated.

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
17
Views
399
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
20
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
8
Views
946
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
484
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
724
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
574
Replies
10
Views
425
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
667
Replies
22
Views
1K
Back
Top