Integration Techniques - Trigonometric Function Substitutions - cis(x)

GreenPrint
Messages
1,186
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I was wondering, just out of curiosity, what family of integrands can be evaluated by making a cis(x) substitution, cis(x)=cos(x)+isin(x), I can't seem to find any examples or anything at all and was wondering if someone could provide an example or inform of how to make such substitutions.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There isn't really a protypical situation to use u = \cos x + i \sin x like there are for other substitution, eg trying t=\tan x if one sees \sqrt{1+t^2} in the integrand. Thing will become for clear when you learn that this mysterious function cis(x) is actually just e^{ix} and all the rules you've learned about exponentials before will apply again.
 
Ya I understand and am familiar with the function. The only problem is that I can't think of a situation period in which I could make such a substitution, nor can I find any examples of when I could do so.
 
Actually, I remember reading something relevant to this in J. Nearing's Mathematical Tools for Physics. Consider:

\int cos(ax)e^{bx}dx + i \int sin(ax)e^{bx}dx

Then by adding integrands:

\int e^{bx}[cos(ax) + i \, sin(ax)]dx

Here we make the substitution cos(ax) + i \, sin(ax) = cis(ax) = e^{i(ax)}

\int e^{bx} e^{iax} dx
\int e^{(b + ia)x} dx

Now the integral is extremely easy. After evaluation, one can consider the real and imaginary parts to obtain \int cos(ax)e^{bx}dx and \int sin(ax)e^{bx}dx without integrating by parts even once!

Try finding that in a Biology textbook.
 
Hmm... Very interesting. Thanks. That's a great integration technique.
 
Don't spread it around too much :wink:
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top