Intensity for circular polarised light through linear polariser

AI Thread Summary
When circularly polarized light passes through a linear polarizer, the intensity is reduced by half, as the polarizer treats circularly polarized light similarly to unpolarized light. In the first scenario described, after the initial vertical linear polarizer, the quarter wave plate converts the light to circular polarization, but the subsequent horizontal polarizer will indeed decrease the intensity again. In the second scenario, starting with a 45° linear polarizer, the quarter wave plate does not affect the polarization significantly, leading to complete absorption by the second -45° polarizer. Thus, the first flow results in a non-zero intensity while the second flow results in zero intensity. The discussion confirms the behavior of polarizers and quarter wave plates in these contexts.
dalind
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi,

does the intensity change when circularly polarised light passes through a linear polariser?
I am thinking of a flow like this: natural light -> vertical linear polariser -> quarter wave plate -> horizontal linear polariser -> intensity?

After the first polariser, the intensity is 50%, the quarter wave plate changes the linear polarisation to circular. But does the horizontal linear polariser decrease the intensity again?

Edit: Another flow would be natural light -> 45° linear polariser -> quarter wave plate -> - 45° linear polariser -> intensity? Since I think the polarisation is not affected by the quarter wave plate if the light is polarised vertically, I think the first flow would result in a complete absorption of the light by the second polariser (Intensity 0), right?

Thank you.

Cheers,
dalind
 
Last edited:
Science news on Phys.org
Yes, the second polariser cuts the intensity of the circular light in half.
 
Last edited:
... and makes it linearly polarized.
A plane polarizer treats circularly polarized light the same as it treats unpolarized light.
 
Okay, thanks. That's what I thought. And this only works for the second flow I described, for the first one the quarter-wave plate would not change the polarization and would therefore practically be useless, right?
 
Thread 'A quartet of epi-illumination methods'
Well, it took almost 20 years (!!!), but I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss). The principles of epi-phase contrast is nearly identical to transillumination phase contrast, but the phase ring is a 1/8 wave retarder rather than a 1/4 wave retarder (because with epi-illumination, the light passes through the ring twice). This method was popular only for a very short period of time before epi-DIC (differential interference contrast) became widely available. So...
I am currently undertaking a research internship where I am modelling the heating of silicon wafers with a 515 nm femtosecond laser. In order to increase the absorption of the laser into the oxide layer on top of the wafer it was suggested we use gold nanoparticles. I was tasked with modelling the optical properties of a 5nm gold nanoparticle, in particular the absorption cross section, using COMSOL Multiphysics. My model seems to be getting correct values for the absorption coefficient and...
After my surgery this year, gas remained in my eye for a while. The light air bubbles appeared to sink to the bottom, and I realized that the brain was processing the information to invert the up/down/left/right image transferred to the retina. I have a question about optics and ophthalmology. Does the inversion of the image transferred to the retina depend on the position of the intraocular focal point of the lens of the eye? For example, in people with farsightedness, the focal point is...
Back
Top