Intensity of EM waves in a conducting medium

ptabor
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
I'm attempting to calculate the above, but I'm stuck.
What I have thus far:

intensity is the time average of the poynting vector, where the poynting vector is the cross product of the E and B fields.
Using the given expressions, I get:
\frac{\sqrt{a^2 + b^2}}{\mu \omega} E_0^2 \exp(-2bz) \frac{\cos\phi}{2}

where a and b are the real and imaginary parts of the complex wave number, k.

\phi is of course the phase angle between the E and B fields (since this is a conducting medium the B field lags).

I'm supposed to show that the intensity is
\frac{a}{2 \mu \omega} E_0^2 \exp(-2bz)
but I don't know how to proceed.

any help would be greatly appreciated.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
perhaps some clarification is in order.

The equations for the Electric and Magnetic fields are as follows:

<br /> E(z,t) = E_0 \exp (-kz) \cos(kz - \omega t + \delta_e)<br /> B(z,t) = \frac{K}{\omega} E_0 \exp(-kz) \cos(kz - \omega t + \delta_b)<br />

I take their cross product (E is in x direction, B is in y, so poynting vector is in z) and integrate over a whole period (omega over two pi) to get the time average. This gives me the 1/2 cos phi term.

K is the modulous of the complex wave number, so it's the square root of the sum of the squared real and imaginary parts (the a and b)
 
if anyone was wondering

This is problem 9.20 from Griffith's intro to E&M

What I missed, in case anybody was wondering, is that the modulous of the complex wave number times the cosine of phi is in fact the real part of the complex wave number, as required.

This can be deduced most easily by graphing k in the complex plane.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top