Introductory quantum mechanics problem

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a quantum mechanics problem involving the momentum operator and an arbitrary function A(x). Participants clarify that the expression for the commutator [px, A(x)] should not have ħ in the denominator, as this contradicts dimensional analysis. The correct formulation reveals that [px, A(x)] simplifies to -iħ*(dA(x)/dx). One user successfully evaluates the commutator and confirms their result aligns with the expected outcome, prompting a suggestion to consult the professor about a potential typo in the assignment. Overall, the thread emphasizes the importance of proper operator handling and dimensional consistency in quantum mechanics.
phys-student
Messages
32
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Consider A(x) is an arbitrary function of x, and px is the momentum operator. Show that they satisfy the following condition:
[px,A(x)] = (-i/ħ)*d/dx(A(x))

where [px,A(x)] = pxA(x) - A(x)px

Homework Equations


ħ = h/2π
px = (-iħ)d/dx

The Attempt at a Solution


Starting with the expression given at the bottom of the question and subbing in the expression for the momentum operator and factoring out -iħ, I get:

[px,A(x)] = -iħ*(d/dx(A(x)) - A(x)d/dx)

and I'm stuck there for the time being... I don't really understand how to get ħ into the denominator or what to do with the term in brackets. Any help would be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
phys-student said:

Homework Statement


Consider A(x) is an arbitrary function of x, and px is the momentum operator. Show that they satisfy the following condition:
[px,A(x)] = (-i/ħ)*d/dx(A(x))
There must be a misprint in the problem as given to you. The ħ should be in the numerator. You can verify this by dimensional analysis.

3. The Attempt at a Solution
Starting with the expression given at the bottom of the question and subbing in the expression for the momentum operator and factoring out -iħ, I get:

[px,A(x)] = -iħ*(d/dx(A(x)) - A(x)d/dx)

When unraveling commutators like this, it is usually a good idea the think of the commutator as acting on some arbitrary function f(x).

Thus, try to simplify [px, A(x)]f(x).
 
h-bar should not be in the denominator. Do a simple unit analysis to see that's not the case.

As for evaluating the commutator, I think it might help if you put the commutator in front of function. Remember p and A are operators, they need to operate on something.

[p,A]\psi = (pA - Ap)\psi = pA\psi - Ap\psi

Now A and psi are just functions of position. But p is a derivative operator acting on everything to its right. Recall the product rule.

pA\psi = p(A)\psi + Ap(\psi)

I'll let you do the rest. Hopefully this makes sense.
 
Thanks to both of you for the help. I've done as you suggested and solved the commutator and found that it was equal to dA(x)/dx, now the answer I have is:

[px,A(x)] = -iħ*(dA(x)/dx)

Another source I've seen online seems to suggest that the first term should be ħ/i (which is equal to my answer -iħ) I will ask my professor whether there is a typo in the assignment tomorrow.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top