I Is 1 u Equal to 931.5 MeV or 931.5 MeV/c²?

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter Christoffer Zakrzews
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    E=mc^2
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the equivalence of 1 atomic mass unit (u) being represented as both 931.5 MeV and 931.5 MeV/c², highlighting the confusion between energy and mass units. It is clarified that while both expressions are valid, they stem from different interpretations of mass-energy equivalence as described by Einstein's E=mc². The conversation emphasizes that in particle physics, it is common to refer to mass in MeV, even though it technically should be expressed as MeV/c². Participants agree that understanding unit conversions is crucial to avoid misinterpretations, especially when transitioning between mass and energy. Ultimately, both representations are correct when the units are properly understood.
Christoffer Zakrzews
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
How can 1 u be eaual to 931,5 MeV, and at the same time be equal to 931,5 MeV/c^2?

(1) 1 u = 931,5 MeV
(2) 1 u = 931,5 MeV/c^2

Becuase then 931,5 MeV would equal to 931,5 MeV/c^2?

1 u = 1 u
(1) = (2)
931,5 MeV = 931,5 MeV/c^2I understand that you can derive both separately or say that 931,5 MeV energi is equal to 931,5 MeV/c^2 in mass (in line with E=mc^2), but isn't it inconsistent as you look at it.

Assume that
1 u = 931,5 MeV (*)

then
1 u = 931,5 MeV = 931,5*c^2 MeV/c^2 = 8,3*10^19 MeV/c^2 (and not 931,5 MeV/c^2)or assume instead that
1 u = 931,5 MeV/c^2 (**)

then
1 u = 931,5 MeV/c^2 = 931,5/c^2 MeV = 1,0*10^-14 MeV (and not 931,5 MeV)

So, is 1 u equal to 931,5 MeV or is it eaual to 1,0*10^-14 MeV?
PS.
Or at least how can I think to not screw things up, to not think:
huum... 1 u = 931,5 MeV/c^2 in the formula, but I don't won't in MeV/c^2, I want in MeV...
okey then I move /c^2 to the number (as I would do with a prefix). c is a number as well as a prefix is, so I can treat them in the same way. Move /c^2 to the number means divide 931,5 with c^2, and MeV is what's left:
931,5 MeV/c^2 = 931,5/c^2 MeV = 1,0*10^-14 MeV

pehaps I don't think
okey, I have mass (931,5 MeV/c^2) and I want energi, then I have to multiply mass with c^2 (as in einsteins) to get energi:
E=mc^2 = 931,5 MeV/c^2 * c^2 = 931,5 MeV
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Remember that c in the appropriate units can be made equal to 1. It is now defined specifically a unit conversion constant (like 12in/1foot) rather than a physical parameter or observed quantity.

The units of eV or MeV depend on the units you chose for the unit of charge. That part is still ambiguous. Give the charge in coulombs and you get
931.5MeV = 931.5 times 1M times 1.60217662 × 10-19 Coulomb Volts or Joules.

If it helps then, view the /c^2 as being absorbed into (or factored out of) the unit choice of the electron charge.

[addendum] As to your specific question when you calculate 1u both answers are correct once you correctly express the units.
 
I can say from personal experience that when talking among themselves, and when writing for each other, particle physicists always refer to masses as MeV (or some other multiple of eV), instead of as MeV/c2. It's a bit sloppy, but everybody in the field understands it. We do the same thing for momentum: MeV instead of MeV/c.

Another way to think of it is that when we say "m = 931.5 MeV" and "p = 500 MeV" we really mean "mc2 = 931.5 MeV" and "pc = 500 MeV". This fits with the way we actually use these numbers in calculations most of the time. For example, a particle with the above-given mass and momentum has energy $$E = \sqrt{m^2 c^4 + p^2 c^2} = \sqrt{(mc^2)^2 + (pc)^2} = \sqrt{(931.5 \text{ MeV})^2 + (500 \text{ MeV})^2} = 1057.2 \text{ MeV}$$
 
jtbell said:
Another way to think of it is that when we say "m = 931.5 MeV" and "p = 500 MeV" we really mean "mc2 = 931.5 MeV" and "pc = 500 MeV".

Okey, thanks.

Calculation * and (1) is wrong.
Calculation ** and (2) is right:

1 u = 931,5 MeV/c2
E(1u) = 1 u * c2 = 931,5 MeV/c2 * c2 = 931,5 MeV

And yes, there are no difference between prefixes and c2. Both are numbers and you can treat them in the same way.

Thus, is

1 u = 931,5 MeV/c2 = 931,5/c2 MeV = 1,0*10-14 MeV

right.

But what's deciving, and can let you in a mindtrap in your weakest moments is that, suddenly you wake up seing 1,0*10-14 MeV on your paper, thinking, but this number has MeV, a energy unit behind itself, and I want my answer in MeV, then I have my energy. Big mistake. 1,0*10-14 MeV is just an expression of a mass with a kinky unit.

You just have to worship Einstein...

jambaugh said:
As to your specific question when you calculate 1u both answers are correct once you correctly express the units.
so
1 u = 931,5 MeV = 1,0*10^-14 MeV ***

...but at the same time, Einstein let you write deciving things like that (***), mixing mass and energi interchangeably in the same equation. Because, after all, Einstein said: mass = energi.

However, I prefer two equations:
1 u = 931,5 MeV/c2
E(1u) = 931,5 MeV
 
Last edited:
comparing a flat solar panel of area 2π r² and a hemisphere of the same area, the hemispherical solar panel would only occupy the area π r² of while the flat panel would occupy an entire 2π r² of land. wouldn't the hemispherical version have the same area of panel exposed to the sun, occupy less land space and can therefore increase the number of panels one land can have fitted? this would increase the power output proportionally as well. when I searched it up I wasn't satisfied with...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
54
Views
10K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top