Is length contraction direction independent?

phyti
Messages
452
Reaction score
8
U is the universal rest frame. A and B space ships pass U at t=0, moving at v. Both experience equal length contraction in the x direction.
If length contraction is a result of em deformation in response to acceleration, then length expansion should be the response to deceleration. If the B ship slows to v=0 between t1 & t2, it should recover its original length.
According to SR, if B moves away from A, A should measure a length contraction of B.
So what happens?

https://www.physicsforums.com/attachments/49680
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
hi phyti! :smile:
phyti said:
If length contraction is a result of em deformation in response to acceleration …

length contraction is a result of the geometry of space, it has nothing to do with electromagnetism

also, the standard length contraction formula, √(1 - v2/c2), depends on relative speed, not acceleration

in A's frame of reference, U is moving away from A, B starts stationary, and from time t1 to time t2 it accelerates away from A until it reaches the same velocity as U, and B's length is contracted increasingly from time t1 to time t2
 
phyti said:
U is the universal rest frame. A and B space ships pass U at t=0, moving at v. Both experience equal length contraction in the x direction.
If length contraction is a result of em deformation in response to acceleration, then length expansion should be the response to deceleration. If the B ship slows to v=0 between t1 & t2, it should recover its original length.
According to SR, if B moves away from A, A should measure a length contraction of B.
So what happens?

https://www.physicsforums.com/attachments/49680
Just like speed is frame dependent, so is length contraction. A ship will be traveling at different speeds in different frames. Since length contraction is a function of the speed of the object in a particular frame, whenever the ship changes its speed in one inertial frame, it will also change its speed in all other inertial frames. Whether that change in speed is considered an acceleration or deceleration is frame dependent. In those frames in which it is an acceleration, the length contraction will increase. In those frames in which it is a deceleration, the length contraction will decrease, or, as you say, there will be length expansion. In fact, a given change in speed in one frame can result in both an acceleration and a deceleration in another frame resulting in no net change in speed and no net change in length.
 
phyti said:
According to SR, if B moves away from A, A should measure a length contraction of B.
So what happens?
Yes, A is measuring length contraction of B. And the catch is in relativity of simultaneity i.e. in A's "now" he is longer than B while in B's "now" he is shorter than B. This is best seen in spacetime diagrams. For example like this one:
minkprob.gif


Now compare length of AC (in "now" of moving object) and AB (in "now" of stationary observer).
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Back
Top