Is material Science & Engineering more science than engineering?

AI Thread Summary
Materials Science and Engineering (MatSci) is a diverse field that merges theoretical and practical aspects of engineering and science. It involves designing and analyzing materials for various applications, from metal alloys to nanotechnology. Professionals in this field work on a range of projects, including the development of materials for aerospace, electronics, and biomedical applications. The discipline requires knowledge of material behavior at different scales, from atomic to macroscopic levels, and employs advanced tools like Density Functional Theory and Molecular Dynamics for simulations and analyses.Career opportunities for MatSci graduates are broad, encompassing roles such as metallurgists, materials analysts, and researchers in various industries, including aerospace, energy, and healthcare. Specific tasks may involve alloy design, corrosion analysis, and the development of functional materials like superconductors and biocompatible implants. The field's breadth allows for a variety of interests to be pursued, making it an appealing choice for those who enjoy both theoretical and applied science.
Toonation
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
I'm double majoring in Chemistry / Materials Science & Engineering undergrad and I'm wandering yes it has engineering in the title but it also has Science as well. Is this engineering say more theory based than others? I read descriptions saying it designs metal alloys and everything like that. I'm assuming this field is big into nano technologies too. I'm just at a loss at what a person with a MatSci degree would actually be doing. I mean my Chemistry advisor told me you can work for IBM, intel, NASA and stuff like that but also having work like helicopter blades etc. However that just seems a bit broad for me I would like information on what exactly do you do and if there's a lot of theory in it. Like yes you're designing new materials so hypothetically will I be the person that's say designing a material to use for motherboards cpus/gpus then a Computer Engineer puts it together or something like that? I mean my Engineering advisor told me that I made a good choice but I do want other opinions :(.

I mean picked MatSci over Chemical Engineering because it seems a lot more interesting.

Also some advice would really help me xD
Idk maybe with a bigger picture I can see it for myself I guess listing what I like someone would interject here and recommend something else? ( ik this is a bit more than a simple question).
-I like math and calculus
-I like more theory based areas in science
-I like chemistry because it deals with elements and particles.
^^ (Although I wish I can take particle physics classes at some point the problem is yes, I like learning about electron entanglement and all that stuff from YouTube lectures (esp. Leonard Susskind's) but I hear the job market for physics is bad. I mean what would a degree in higher energy physics get you? A teaching job? Maybe so CERN research hear and there?)
-I like computers and I've even "built" or more like assembled my own computer.


I have a lot of stuff going on in this post I hope you the reader don't mind I'm just over thinking atm xD
 
Physics news on Phys.org
One asks some good questions.

Materials Science and Engineering is a broad discipline, as are other branches of engineering. It combines theory and application, perhaps with different degrees of mix according to the problem or challenge being addressed. Such a problem might be designing/selecting a material system, analyzing/predicting a materials performance, analyzing performance or failure, etc.

Design or analysis of a material can encompass a broad range of scales. MSE folks can employ studies/analysis at the atomistic level (angstroms) up to a large scale cm to m or 10s of m.

Large scale analysis may involve continuum mechanics/dynamics based on empirical models. Those empirical models are often based on large (laboratory) scale experiment, however they can be improved/supplemented by mesoscale or atomistically informed experiments and models/simulations, particularly for materials in high temperature or high stress environments.

For example, in gas turbines of jet engines or power plants, in rocket propulsion or in other power systems, one deals with creep of the high temperature material, so understanding creep as it relates to atomic diffusion or dislocation movement requires an atomistic understanding of the material/alloy system. Protective coatings for corrosion mitigation or corrosion behavior requires an atomistic understanding of the interaction of the protective/passive coating between the environment and material/alloy system.

Materials scientists and engineers are using tools like Density Functional/Phase Field Theory (DFT/PFT) and Molecular Dynamics (MD) to better understand material behavior, and then employing improved models/simulations using computational physics in finite element/volume analyses.
 
Last edited:
Toonation said:
I'm just at a loss at what a person with a MatSci degree would actually be doing.

I have an B.Eng in Materials Science and am currently doing a PhD in materials, so I have come across loads of people doing loads of different things,
Metallurgist I have met work on (for example):
* Alloying making in bulk alloys like steel and aluminium
* Ni-based super alloys for single-crystal plane engine blades
* Corrosion of pipelines and nuclear waste storage
* coatings to prevent high temperature oxidation in PWR nuclear plants
* work on Ti-implants for biomaterials (heart stents, etc)
* rare Earth magnets

Functional materials
* piezoelectric and magnetostrictive projects
* bioglasses
* investment casting shells
* Hydrogen storage
* superconductive elements
* fuel cells
*photovoltaics

Polymers
* All sorts of interesting things with PEI/PEEK mixtures
* bulk polymer manufacture
* sensors

On top of this I know a lot of people who do Finite element modelling on systems like casting and functional ceramics

materials engineering is rad and there are lots of different projects.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Thank you guys I have a better understanding of it. So my thought of it seeming broad is true which isn't a bad thing that means you'd have a lot of stuff to do xD
 
Hey, I am Andreas from Germany. I am currently 35 years old and I want to relearn math and physics. This is not one of these regular questions when it comes to this matter. So... I am very realistic about it. I know that there are severe contraints when it comes to selfstudy compared to a regular school and/or university (structure, peers, teachers, learning groups, tests, access to papers and so on) . I will never get a job in this field and I will never be taken serious by "real"...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...
Back
Top