Is My Lie Algebra 4D or 5D Given These Structure Constants?

bartadam
Messages
40
Reaction score
0
I have five generators of a lie algebra, g_1,g_2,g_3,g_4,g_5 which at first glance I believe are independent, although I could be wrong.

I have calculated the structure constants, i.e.

\left[g_i,g_j\right]=f_{ij}^k g_k

And from that I have calculated a matrix rep using \left(T_i\right)_j^k=f_{ij}^k

I get T_1, T_2, T_3, T_4 all linearly independent.

However I get T_4=-T_5 which I do not understand. Does this mean there algebra is only 4D rather than 5D?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi again, I could really use some help on this please.

I have also realized T1+T2+T3=0.

I do not understand. Does this mean g1+g2+g3=0. I do not believe this at all.
 
The dimension of a lie algebra depends on the representation you choose for it.
Recall that a representation is a map d:L(G)\to M(V), where L(G) is the lie algebra of some lie group G and M(V) is the space of linear transformations V\to V (V=\mathbb{R}, \mathbb{C}).

So, for example, you could have what is called the trivial representation where d(g)=0 for all g\in L(G), which is one dimensional, even though your algebra could has more than one element.

Another example is the fundamental representation, where d(g)=g for all g\in L(G). Here the dimension of the lie algebra is equal to the number of elements in the algebra (called the rank of the algebra).

In the example that you state, where the matrix representation equals the structure constants, is called the adjoint representation. I would guess, from the information that you give, that that representation is 3 dimensional, as you have 2 constraints over 5 five "variables".
 
Thread 'Derivation of equations of stress tensor transformation'
Hello ! I derived equations of stress tensor 2D transformation. Some details: I have plane ABCD in two cases (see top on the pic) and I know tensor components for case 1 only. Only plane ABCD rotate in two cases (top of the picture) but not coordinate system. Coordinate system rotates only on the bottom of picture. I want to obtain expression that connects tensor for case 1 and tensor for case 2. My attempt: Are these equations correct? Is there more easier expression for stress tensor...
Back
Top