Is ψ(x) = a0exp(-βx²) an Eigenfunction of the Hamiltonian?

phys2
Messages
21
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A particle moves in a one dimensional potential : V(x) = 1/2(mω2x

Show that the function ψ(x) = a0exp(-βx2) is an eigenfunction for the Hamiltonian for a suitable value of β and calculate the value of energy E1

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



What I did was take the Hamiltonian, differentiate twice the function ψ(x) and then sub in the twice differentiated function along with the potential into the Hamiltonian. But there I get confused. Apparently taking a peek at the solutions, it argues that you should set the Hamiltonian to zero and then since it is supposed to be a constant, the x^2 terms cancel out and your final answer is β=mω/2hbar. I have no idea what they have done though! Any one care to explain? Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
phys2 said:

Homework Statement



A particle moves in a one dimensional potential : V(x) = 1/2(mω2x

Show that the function ψ(x) = a0exp(-βx2) is an eigenfunction for the Hamiltonian for a suitable value of β and calculate the value of energy E1

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



What I did was take the Hamiltonian, differentiate twice the function ψ(x) and then sub in the twice differentiated function along with the potential into the Hamiltonian.
Show us what you got when you did that. If ##\psi## is an eigenfunction of ##\hat{H}##, what does ##\hat{H}\psi## have to equal?

But there I get confused. Apparently taking a peek at the solutions, it argues that you should set the Hamiltonian to zero and then since it is supposed to be a constant, the x^2 terms cancel out and your final answer is β=mω/2hbar. I have no idea what they have done though! Any one care to explain? Thanks!
 
So I got -h(bar)2/2m (4β2x2) ψ + 1/2mω2x2ψ = Hamiltonian

Hψ=Eψ?
 
phys2 said:
So I got -h(bar)2/2m (4β2x2) ψ + 1/2mω2x2ψ = Hamiltonian
You're missing a term. You didn't differentiate correctly, perhaps.

Hψ=Eψ?
Right, so after applying the Hamiltonian, you should be able to write the result as a constant times the original wave function. To do that, β will have to take on a specific value.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top