Is Raster Scanning Still the Best for High-Resolution SEM Imaging?

AI Thread Summary
Raster scanning remains a prevalent method for high-resolution scanning electron microscopy (SEM) imaging, but questions arise about its effectiveness compared to newer technologies. The discussion highlights that the scan type itself does not inherently affect resolution; rather, improvements in resolution depend on the electron gun and other components. The analogy of reading smaller print emphasizes that changing the scanning pattern alone won't enhance image clarity without better optics. Clarification is made that the raster generator is likely associated with the electron gun. Overall, while raster scanning is still widely used, advancements in SEM technology continue to evolve.
SupaVillain
Messages
47
Reaction score
2
Looking at Ben Krasnow's youtube video on breaking down the parts and general cost for a scanning electron microscope, he lists a raster scan generator, is that able to produce the highest resolution images still? Or is there another more modern technology for this purpose? Otherwise, how has raster scanning advanced to increase resolution?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Coincidentally, I watched that exact video earlier today.
I don't see how the scan type would affect resolution. Reading a book is very much like raster scanning, if you want to read smaller print then reading the text in a different pattern (say, a spiral) will not help one bit - you need glasses.
Take this with a large grain of salt as my knowledge of SEM is next to nil.
 
It seems I just had a misunderstanding, I think the raster generator would be the actual electron gun
 
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...
Back
Top