Is the Electrostatic Force Calculation Correct for Inclined Bar and Wire?

hastings
Messages
80
Reaction score
0
find electrostatic force

problem:
there's a long straight wire with a λ1 charge. at some distance from it there's a bar charged with a λ2 charge. the bar is not parallel to the straight wire, instead it's inclined with an angle "alpha" between the dotted line, parallel to the wire, passing through the middle of the bar(point A), and the bar itself. The entire bar is long L. the distance between the wire and point A, is H.

Please check out the diagram.

What I did:

E=\frac{\lambda_1}{2\pi\epsilon_0 x} this is the electrical field generated by the wire.

dq_2=\lambda_2 dl . is this right? Then...

dx=dl \sin\alpha \longrightarrow dl=\frac{1}{\sin\alpha}dx . if this is right then I substitute in the above relation:

dq_2=\lambda_2 dl=\lambda_2\frac{1}{\sin\alpha}dx Is this correct till this point?

F=\int_{H- \frac{L}{2}\sin\alpha}^{H+\frac{L}{2}\sin\alpha} dF

Are the extremes of integration right?

Now the big problem is putting the pieces together.

F=\int_{H-\frac{L}{2}\sin\alpha}^{H+\frac{L}{2}\sin\alpha}dF= \int_{H-\frac{L}{2}\sin\alpha}^{H+\frac{L}{2}\sin\alpha}Edq_2=\int_{H-\frac{L}{2}\sin\alpha}^{H+\frac{L}{2}\sin\alpha}\frac{\lambda_1}{2\pi\epsilon_0 x}\lambda_2dl=\int_{H-\frac{L}{2}\sin\alpha}^{H+\frac{L}{2}\sin\alpha}\frac{\lambda_1}{2\pi\epsilon_0 x}(\lambda_2 \frac{1}{\sin\alpha }dx)


Could you tell me whether I need to fix anything?
 

Attachments

  • prob2.jpg
    prob2.jpg
    4.1 KB · Views: 479
  • prob2.1.jpg
    prob2.1.jpg
    10 KB · Views: 483
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Is it correct? Is it wrong?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top