Is the Fugacity Equation the Key to Proving Chemical Thermodynamics?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the application of the fugacity equation in chemical thermodynamics, specifically in relation to solution thermodynamics. The participant outlines the relationship between molar Gibbs energy, pressure, and fugacity, proposing a connection through fundamental thermodynamic relations. They derive an equation linking the change in fugacity to molar volume and temperature, suggesting that this relationship can validate the fugacity equation's relevance. The participant seeks confirmation on their approach and the accuracy of their derivation. The conversation highlights the importance of fugacity in understanding thermodynamic properties of solutions.
danago
Gold Member
Messages
1,118
Reaction score
4
Hey. I am currently studying chemical thermodynamics and have reached the section on solution thermodynamics.

For a pure liquid:

<br /> \left(\frac{\partial g}{\partial P}\right)_T=RT \left(\frac{\partial ln(f)}{\partial P}\right)_T<br />

Where g is the molar gibbs energy
P is pressure
T is temperature
R is the ideal gas constant
f is the fugacity

My first thought was to make use of one of the fundamental thermodynamic relations:

dg = v dP - s dT \Rightarrow \left(\frac{\partial g}{\partial P}\right)_T=v

Where v is the molar volume and s is the molar entropy.

Anybody have any suggestions for a next step? :smile:

Thanks in advance,
Dan.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ok, just as i posted this i had an idea.

Fugacity is defined by the equation:

<br /> g-g^{o}=RT ln (\frac{f}{f^o})<br />

Since the reference state is fixed (i.e. dg^o=df^o=0):

<br /> dg = RT d(ln f)<br />

Equating this with dg from the fundamental thermodynamic relation i mentioned in the first post (with dT=0 since temperature is being held constant):

RT d(ln f) = v dP \Rightarrow \frac{d(ln f)}{dP}=\frac{v}{RT}

Substituting in (from the first post)

<br /> \left(\frac{\partial g}{\partial P}\right)_T=v<br />

will give the required relationship.

Does that look right?
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top