Is the Magnitude of an Electric Field Consistent Across All Spatial Locations?

AI Thread Summary
The magnitude of an electric field is not consistent across all spatial locations; it varies depending on the distance from the source charge. The electric field strength is defined as the force experienced by a test charge divided by the magnitude of that charge. As one moves away from the source charge, the field's magnitude decreases, which is crucial for its practical application. The test charge used to measure the field must be sufficiently small to avoid altering the electric field configuration. Therefore, understanding the variation of electric field strength is essential for accurate measurements and applications in physics.
BadSkittles
Messages
34
Reaction score
0
Hello, in an electric field, are the magnitudes of the field the same regardless of the spatial location? Or is the field's magnitude similar to the force experienced by the test charge where it gets smaller as you move away from the source charge? Any clarification would be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
BadSkittles said:
Hello, in an electric field, are the magnitudes of the field the same regardless of the spatial location? Or is the field's magnitude similar to the force experienced by the test charge where it gets smaller as you move away from the source charge? Any clarification would be appreciated.
By definition: The magnitude of the field is the same as the magnitude of the force experienced by a test charge with a charge q, divided by q. (The direction is the same as the force experienced by a positive test charge.)

i.e. we write: ##\vec{E} = \vec{F}/q##

In general, the magnitude of the field varies from place to place.
You should be able to tell this - if the field were the same no matter where you were then how would it be useful?
 
Last edited:
The test charge must be arbitrarily small so as not to affect the E field being measured. So really E = lim q → 0 of F/q.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
  • Like
Likes 1 person
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top