Is 'The Secret Law of Attraction' considered quantum physics? Do you support it?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between the 'Law of Attraction' as presented in the movie 'The Secret' and quantum physics. Participants explore the validity of the law, its implications, and its scientific grounding, while addressing the controversy surrounding its claims.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that the 'Law of Attraction' is reminiscent of quantum physics but notes that there is controversy regarding its interpretation and the role of brain waves.
  • Another participant dismisses the law as "complete bull," indicating a strong skepticism towards its validity.
  • Several participants request clarification on the dismissal, seeking a deeper understanding of why the law is considered invalid in the context of quantum physics.
  • One participant argues that the burden of proof lies with those who claim the law is valid, emphasizing that it is not the responsibility of skeptics to justify their disbelief.
  • Another participant expresses curiosity about the perspectives of those who study quantum physics, referencing a quantum physicist featured in related media.
  • There are strong assertions that the 'Law of Attraction' has no basis in science, with claims that it is an old concept with no connection to quantum mechanics or any scientific principles.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants exhibit significant disagreement regarding the validity of the 'Law of Attraction.' While some express curiosity and seek clarification, others firmly reject the concept as unfounded and nonsensical.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference various media and figures associated with the 'Law of Attraction' and quantum physics, but there is no consensus on the scientific validity of the law itself. The discussion highlights differing interpretations and the need for evidence to support claims.

matthayzon89
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
I have seen the movie 'The Secret Law of Attraction'. It seems to remind my of quantum physics a bit. However, I read about the concept behind the creation of the movie and have come across a lot of controversy. Some people are saying the law of attraction usually does not take the function of brain waves into account, and when it does it misinterprets how it works.

To those who are unfamiliar with the 'Law of Attraction", it basically states that what ever one feels, thinks, and visualizes, eventually happens, whether you think about what you DONT want or if you think about what you DO want, you are going to get more of what ever you think of whether positive or negative. It also states that anything that happens in your life is a result of your thought process, anything that is a part of your life you have attracted.I am interested how quantum physics relates to the law of attraction? People such as Albert Einstein, Alexander Graham Bell, and many other memorable names in our history are believed to support this idea.

If you think it does not relate to quantum physics, would you think that quantum physics has some similarities to cosmic ordering?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It is complete bull. Nothing more to say.
 
Why? can you please support your answer so I get a better understanding on why it is 'bull' when applied to quantum physics?
 
matthayzon89 said:
Why? can you please support your answer so I get a better understanding on why it is 'bull' when applied to quantum physics?
It's not just bull when it's "applied to quantum physics". It's always bull. If you want a more specific answer, you will have to ask a more specific question. For example, you can ask about a specific situation in which this "law of attraction" is supposed to be valid (according to the believers).
 
This belongs in debunking, not QM.

As for "support your answer": Here is some science for you, and law for you... it's called the "Burden of Proof". It's not incumbent upon Nicksauce, or Fredrik, or me to justify an answer... the better question is: Why do people believe this? Justify the "theory"... prove it... that's science. If I choose to call a rock, mustard... it's not your responsibility to explain to me how ridiculous that is, but rather, it's my responsibility to show how that rock... is mustard.

"The Secret", is pure New-Age crystal-gripping nonsense used by fools to make money from even greater fools, via P.T. Barnums "conjecture".

I'd say more, but I'm not feeling like getting banned today.
 
lol sorrrrrrrrrrry, i didnt mean to offend anyone, or make anyone angry, i was just curious...thats all...

b/c the movie "what the bleep do we know" has this quantum physicist in it that is also in "law of attraction" that all... I was just interested in how people that actually study quantum physics feel about it.

Thanks for the input.
 
matthayzon89 said:
lol sorrrrrrrrrrry, i didnt mean to offend anyone, or make anyone angry, i was just curious...thats all...

b/c the movie "what the bleep do we know" has this quantum physicist in it that is also in "law of attraction" that all... I was just interested in how people that actually study quantum physics feel about it.

Thanks for the input.

There is no law of attraction... it's pure and utter horse****. People who "actually study quantum physics" are deeply tired of saying that. Truly, that concept is an old one, and has NOTHING To do with science, be it QM, or Newtonian mechanics. It's just an old line of crap. What do you want to hear about it, beyond that fact that it's a pure fantasy sold to gulls?

EDIT: Keep in mind that being a scientist doesn't make you immune to the lure of money, or the more ephemeral lure of pure fantasy. A degree doesn't make you any less human. This is why "peer review" and "The Scientific Method" are first principles in any rigorous field.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • Sticky
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
9K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 143 ·
5
Replies
143
Views
12K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K