Is the W boson in this decay a vector boson based on parity nonconservation?

gildomar
Messages
98
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement



"(a) Draw a quark-flow diagram for the weak decay \pi^{-}\rightarrow\mu^{-}+\overline{\nu_{\mu}} . Explicitly include the appropriate intermediate vector boson. (b) By considering the production of \mu^{-} and \overline{\nu_{\mu}} in the rest frame of the vector boson, show from the necessary parity nonconservation that the boson is indeed a vector type, that is, that it has spin one."

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I know that the intermediary step for the decay is the pion turning into a charged W boson, which in turn decays into the muon and antineutrino. I also don't have a problem drawing the reaction in terms of the quark content. The part that I'm unsure about is what, if any, role the pion has in the interaction in the W boson's rest frame. That is, I'm not whether to include it or not, since I know that W bosons prefer to decay to just leptons, but it seems wrong to leave it out. Whether or not to include obviously will also affect the parity nonconservation test. Though the wording for that part is a little strange, since it would seem to make more sense to just look at the spins to show that the spin of the W is 1 instead of checking parity.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The pion is at rest in the same frame as the W boson. It "decays" to an off-shell W boson, and that "decays" to muon+neutrino. Only the second process should be relevant for parity non-conservation.
 
I was beginning to suspect that. Now I just need to figure out how the parity non-conservation leads to the W boson being spin 1 when it emits the muon and antineutrino. The closest that I got is that it has something to do with the muon and antineutrino being emitted directly opposite each other compared to the W boson so as to conserve momentum. Possibly something also about them having opposite angular momentum as well to conserve that too.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top