- #1
arkajad
- 1,481
- 4
So, I am learning about tangent-valued differential forms, operations on forms and Frolicher-Nijenhuis bracket, and I am writing a blog about what I have learned. In two monographs I have spotted a formula that - as far as can see - has a missing factor.
At least this is how I understand what is written. Of course when we deal with differential forms, there are at least two different conventions and this needs to be taken into account. But I think in this case the conventions are clear and yet a factor seems to be missing.
My notes on the subject and the problem I am having is http://arkadiusz-jadczyk.eu/blog/?p=324".
A bucket full of cold water on my head will be greatly appreciated.
At least this is how I understand what is written. Of course when we deal with differential forms, there are at least two different conventions and this needs to be taken into account. But I think in this case the conventions are clear and yet a factor seems to be missing.
My notes on the subject and the problem I am having is http://arkadiusz-jadczyk.eu/blog/?p=324".
A bucket full of cold water on my head will be greatly appreciated.
Last edited by a moderator:
