Is there a way to replace nuclear power with a (big) hydrogen fuel cell

AI Thread Summary
A large hydrogen fuel cell could theoretically replace a nuclear reactor for power generation, but hydrogen production requires significant energy input, making it a less efficient energy source. While hydrogen serves as a storage medium, generating it through methods like electrolysis or thermochemical cycles can be more efficient than traditional solar panels. There are discussions about using high-temperature electrolysis in nuclear reactors to produce hydrogen more effectively. The efficiency of hydrogen fuel cells and the practicality of individual fuel cells for residential use are also considered, raising questions about their scalability and profitability. Overall, while hydrogen has potential, its reliance on energy for production limits its effectiveness as a standalone power source.
baywax
Gold Member
Messages
2,175
Reaction score
1
Could one really big hydrogen fuel cell battery replace a nuclear reactor in providing power to millions of people? This may end up being a safer option for generating power.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
baywax said:
Could one really big hydrogen fuel cell battery replace a nuclear reactor in providing power to millions of people? This may end up being a safer option for generating power.

Sure.

But what are you going to use to produce the Hydrogen? Electrolysis on seawater? And the energy for that comes from... ?
 
No. Coincidentally someone answered a related thread with the perfect explanation. Hydrogen is not naturally occurring, you need to use energy to produce hydrogen. Hydrogen is only useful as a storage medium. You create hydrogen and can use it in hydrogen powered automobiles for example. However, it's a net loss, you need energy to create it and then you use it, with less than 100% efficiency, for something else such as powering a car. It's not a fuel source such as naturally occurring oil, sunlight, wind power etc.
 
russ_watters said:
That sounds vaguely familiar... :-p

I think you copied me in another thread...
 
Pengwuino said:
No. Coincidentally someone answered a related thread with the perfect explanation. Hydrogen is not naturally occurring, you need to use energy to produce hydrogen. Hydrogen is only useful as a storage medium. You create hydrogen and can use it in hydrogen powered automobiles for example. However, it's a net loss, you need energy to create it and then you use it, with less than 100% efficiency, for something else such as powering a car. It's not a fuel source such as naturally occurring oil, sunlight, wind power etc.

So using solar power to produce the hydrogen would be redundant... when you could simply generate the power with the solar power?
 
baywax said:
So using solar power to produce the hydrogen would be redundant... when you could simply generate the power with the solar power?

No. There are many prospective methods of producing hydrogen with sunlight that are much more efficient and cheaper than just using solar panels. Thermochemical and photochemical cycles can reach efficiencies more than double that of similar priced solar cells and using SOFCs (~70% efficient) to generate electricity.

You can also generate hydrogen via high temperature electrolysis in a nuclear reactor and use fuel cells generate power more efficiently than you can with a typical rankin cycle design.
 
Using solar power to produce hydrogen also allows you to store the solar energy.
 
RandomGuy88 said:
Using solar power to produce hydrogen also allows you to store the solar energy.

Solar power isn't particularly efficient as it is (30% at best?).

Allowing for energy loss during the process of extracting the Hydrogen, you get a very inefficient system.

Other renewable sources may be better suited.
 
  • #10
Topher925 said:
No. There are many prospective methods of producing hydrogen with sunlight that are much more efficient and cheaper than just using solar panels. Thermochemical and photochemical cycles can reach efficiencies more than double that of similar priced solar cells and using SOFCs (~70% efficient) to generate electricity.

You can also generate hydrogen via high temperature electrolysis in a nuclear reactor and use fuel cells generate power more efficiently than you can with a typical rankin cycle design.

Ok. Very good to hear that. Kind of a play on photosynthesis or a metabolic system that produces hydrogen.

Also a good comment about how using solar energy to produce hydrogen is a form of storing solar energy for later use.

How big and how efficient would a hydrogen fuel cell... or fuel cell of any kind... have to be to power millions of people's needs? Or would it be profitable and safer etc... to include the individual fuel cells with each residence or apartment etc...?

Also, since fuel cell batteries were used during the Apollo series missions ( around 1969), haven't they been perfected to a point of being able to power helicopters and so on?
 
Back
Top