Is there an alternative method to solve this problem?

  • Thread starter Thread starter asap9993
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Method
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a related rates problem involving water flow into a bottle with a varying diameter. The participants explore using the formula for the volume of a cylinder to approximate the situation, leading to a calculation of the rate at which the water level rises. They confirm that using the chain rule and the relationship between volume and height is a valid approach, ultimately arriving at the same answer of 0.529 cm/s for the rate of height increase. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding geometric relationships and applying calculus principles correctly. Overall, the method discussed is deemed appropriate for solving the problem effectively.
asap9993
Messages
19
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Here's the problem:
Water is flowing into a water bottle at a rate of 16.5 cm^3/s. The diameter of the bottle varies with its height. How fast is the water level rising when the diameter is 6.30 cm?


Homework Equations


dV/dt = 16.5

radius = r = 3.15

dh/dt = ?

The Attempt at a Solution


I know it's a related rates problem, but there's no obvious geometric formula to take the derivative of. Or is there? So I pictured a regular Poland Spring water bottle. I noticed that most sections of the bottle come pretty close to a cylinder. So I guessed that I could approximate the rate with that of a cylinder.

V = pi(h)(r^2)

dV/dt = pi(r^2)(dh/dt)

the radius is the constant throughout a cylinder, so r^2 is a constant.

16.5 = pi(3.15^2)(dh/dt)

dh/dt = 0.529 cm/s

This is the correct answer, but is this the correct way to do this problem. I don't like taking risky guesses and approximations. Luckily it worked this time.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't care for the V = pi(h)(r^2).
Better to picture an infinitesimally thick layer of water of height dh, which has volume dV = πr²*dh. That gives you an expression for dh/dV that you can put together with the given value for dV/dt to get dh/dt. Same answer.
 
hi asap9993! :smile:

(have a pi: π and try using the X2 tag just above the Reply box :wink:)

here's a reasonably systematic way …

the basic formula for volume is V = ∫x=0h A dx (A = area, h = height).

So dV/dh = … ? :smile:
 
To tiny-tim,

I don't quite understand why we are concentrating on the rate of change of the volume with respect to height instead of time. If you define volume as that integral then,

dV/dh = A = pi(r^2) = pi(3.15^2) = 31.17 cm^2

I guess we could find how the height is changing with respect to time by the chain rule:

dh/dt = (dV/dt)(dh/dV)

dh/dt = (16.5)(1/31.17) = 0.529 cm/s

Is that it?
 
hi asap9993! :wink:
asap9993 said:
I don't quite understand why we are concentrating on the rate of change of the volume with respect to height instead of time.

I guess we could find how the height is changing with respect to time by the chain rule:

Is that it?

yes, that's right :smile:

do the obvious first (volume vs height), then use the chain rule to adapt it to the question asked :wink:
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top