Is there an Altitude Dependence on Helmholtz Free Energy?

yadamada
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


[/B]
The density of nitrogen molecules is larger at a sea level than at a higher elevation. Assuming thermal equilibrium, what is the altitude dependence of the (Helmholtz)free energy per particle?

Homework Equations


F=U-TS, not sure if anything else is relevant

The Attempt at a Solution


My initial guess is no. Mainly because looking at the equation for free energy, the temperature is the same because of thermal equilibrium, and the internal energy is the same. Since we are talking about free energy per particle, I would imagine density would have nothing to do with it. But at a higher altitude, the pressure would be less, and I am not exactly sure how pressure affects the free energy. Thanks. My options are that the free energy would be:

greater at sea level compared to higher elevation
less than sea level
the same
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In the lower atmosphere, the temperature decreases with altitude. The lapse rate is on the order of about 10 K per km. You can also calculate the average pressure at any altitude from the barotropic equation. Why don't you just calculate the Helmholtz free energy per mole as a function of altitude and see what it comes out to be?

Chet
 
Chestermiller said:
In the lower atmosphere, the temperature decreases with altitude. The lapse rate is on the order of about 10 K per km. You can also calculate the average pressure at any altitude from the barotropic equation. Why don't you just calculate the Helmholtz free energy per mole as a function of altitude and see what it comes out to be?

Chet
isnt the fact that the question states it is in thermal equilibrium the temperature will be the same?
 
yadamada said:
isnt the fact that the question states it is in thermal equilibrium the temperature will be the same?
Actually, I don't know what they mean. In the actual atmosphere, the temperature decreases with altitude.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top