Is This Spinor Identity Correct?

Geremy Holly
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Given the spinors:
\Psi_{1}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\left(\psi-\psi^{c}\right)
\Psi_{2}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\left(\psi+\psi^{c}\right)
Where c denotes charge conjugation, show that for a vector boson #A_{\mu}#;
<br /> A_{\mu}\overline{\Psi_{1}}\gamma^{\mu}\Psi_{2}<br /> +<br /> A_{\mu}\overline{\Psi_{2}}\gamma^{\mu}\Psi_{1}<br /> =<br /> 2<br /> A_{\mu}\overline{\psi}\gamma^{\mu}\psi<br />

Homework Equations


##\psi^{c}=-i\gamma^{2}\psi^{*}##
##\overline{\psi}=\psi^{\dagger}\gamma^{0}##
##\{\gamma^{\mu},\gamma^{\nu}\}=2\eta^{\mu\nu}##
##\gamma^{2}\gamma^{\mu}\gamma^{2}=(\gamma^{\mu})^{*}##

The Attempt at a Solution


Plugging in ##\Psi_{1,2}## it is easy to show that
<br /> A_{\mu}\overline{\Psi_{1}}\gamma^{\mu}\Psi_{2}<br /> +<br /> A_{\mu}\overline{\Psi_{2}}\gamma^{\mu}\Psi_{1}<br /> =<br /> A_{\mu}(\overline{\psi}\gamma^{\mu}\psi-\overline{\psi^{c}}\gamma^{\mu}\psi^{c})<br />
So for the identity I want to prove to be true I need to prove that
\overline{\psi^{c}}\gamma^{\mu}\psi^{c}=-\overline{\psi}\gamma^{\mu}\psi
Plugging in the definition of ##\psi^{c}## gives

\begin{align*}
\overline{\psi^{c}}\gamma^{\mu}\psi^{c}
&=
(-i\gamma^{2}\psi^{*})^{\dagger}\gamma^{0}\gamma^{\mu}(-i\gamma^{2}\psi^{*})\\
&=
(i\psi^{T}(\gamma^{2})^{\dagger})\gamma^{0}\gamma^{\mu}(-i\gamma^{2}\psi^{*})\\
&=
\psi^{T}\gamma^{0}\gamma^{2}\gamma^{\mu}\gamma^{2}\psi^{*}\\
&=
\psi^{T}\gamma^{0}(\gamma^{\mu})^{*}\psi^{*}\\
&=
(\psi^{\dagger}\gamma^{0}(\gamma^{\mu})\psi)^{*}\\
&=
(\overline{\psi}\gamma^{\mu}\psi)^{*}\\
\end{align*}
Which disagress with the required expression unless it is purely imaginary! I have absolutely no idea where I've gone wrong and would really appreciate some help spotting my error.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Geremy Holly said:
So for the identity I want to prove to be true I need to prove that
\overline{\psi^{c}}\gamma^{\mu}\psi^{c}=-\overline{\psi}\gamma^{\mu}\psi

That doesn't seem like it could be true. Look at the ##\gamma^0## term. You would need:

##\overline{\psi^{c}}\gamma^0 \psi^{c}=-\overline{\psi}\gamma^0\psi##

But ##\overline{\psi} = \psi^\dagger \gamma^0##. So the left-hand side is:

##- \psi^\dagger \gamma^0 \gamma^0 \psi = - \psi^\dagger \psi## (because ##\gamma^0 \gamma^0 = 1##).

But ##\psi^\dagger \psi## is always positive. Similarly, ##(\psi^c)^\dagger (\psi^c)## is always positive. So they can't have opposite signs (unless they're both zero).

Something is screwy here.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...

Similar threads

Back
Top