Is this statement acceptable? (time derivative of a rotating vector)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the validity of a statement regarding the time derivative of a rotating vector, specifically addressing the treatment of delta t in the approximation. It confirms that both delta phi and delta t are positive, aligning their signs in the context of angular motion. The forum participants explore the formal derivation of the time derivative of a vector with constant magnitude and changing direction, emphasizing the relationship between the unit vector and its angular change. The acceptance of the limit statement regarding delta A and delta t is questioned, with a counterexample provided to illustrate that it is not universally valid. Overall, the conversation highlights the nuances in mathematical definitions and their implications in vector calculus.
Clockclocle
Messages
31
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
Is this statement acceptable?
Relevant Equations
..........
Capture.PNG


I understand the approximation statement but he divide the |delta t| in the left but only delta t on the right. Is it true because delta phi would have the same sign as delta t ?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes. By definition ##\Delta \phi## is positive and the angle increases in the direction of the arrow in the top figure. ##\Delta t## is always positive.
 
kuruman said:
Yes. By definition ##\Delta \phi## is positive and the angle increases in the direction of the arrow in the top figure. ##\Delta t## is always positive.
He also use the fact that lim |##\Delta A##/##\Delta t##| = |lim ##\Delta A##/##\Delta t##|. Is that accepted?
 
There is a more formal way to show the same thing which I prefer.

You have a vector ##\mathbf A## that has constant magnitude ##A## and direction ##\mathbf {\hat a}## that changes with time. You can write the vector as its constant magnitude times the unit vector specifying the direction, ##\mathbf A=A~\mathbf {\hat a}##. Now $$\frac{d\mathbf A}{dt}=A\frac{d\mathbf {\hat a}}{dt}.$$ To find the derivative of the unit vector ##\mathbf a##, consider the drawing on the right. A
Unit Vectors.png
unit vector in the direction of changing angle ##\theta## is perpendicular to ##\mathbf {\hat a}.## In terms of the fixed Cartesian unit vectors
$$\begin{align} & \mathbf {\hat a}=\cos\!\theta~\mathbf {\hat x}+\sin\!\theta~\mathbf {\hat y} \\
& \mathbf {\hat {\theta}}=-\sin\!\theta~\mathbf {\hat x}+\cos\!\theta~\mathbf {\hat y}
\end{align}$$Now from equation (1) $$\frac{d\mathbf {\hat a}}{dt}=\frac{d\theta}{dt}(-\sin\!\theta~\mathbf {\hat x}+\cos\!\theta~\mathbf {\hat y})=\frac{d\theta}{dt}\mathbf {\hat{\theta}}$$ and the time rate of change of the constant-magnitude vector ##\mathbf A## is $$\frac{d\mathbf A}{dt}=A\frac{d\mathbf {\hat a}}{dt}=A\frac{d\theta}{dt}\mathbf {\hat{\theta}}.$$
 
Clockclocle said:
He also use the fact that lim |##\Delta A##/##\Delta t##| = |lim ##\Delta A##/##\Delta t##|. Is that accepted?
Not in general. Consider ##\lim _{x\rightarrow 0}(-1)^{\lfloor \frac 1x\rfloor}##.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top