Is This the Correct Solution for Kirchhoff's Loop Problem?

  • Thread starter Thread starter shrabastee
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Kirchhoff Loop
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on solving Kirchhoff's Loop Problem to find the currents I1, I2, and I3. The user presents three equations derived from the circuit analysis and shares their calculated values for the currents. A confirmation is sought regarding the correctness of the equations and the resulting current values. The solution is affirmed, with a note on the alternative approach of using a single equation for potential by applying the current rule. The conversation highlights the effectiveness of different methods in circuit analysis.
shrabastee
Messages
18
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


We are to find I1, I2 and I3 in the diagram.


Homework Equations


These are the three equations I got. I need to know if they're correct.
x=I1
y=I2
z=I3

12y-24+35x=0
35x+34z-18=0
x=y+z

The Attempt at a Solution


Values I got on solving:
I1=0.508
I2=0.511
I3=0.0029

(Note: r=1 ohm)

kindly tell me if this is correct! :)
 

Attachments

  • sum2.jpg
    sum2.jpg
    17.3 KB · Views: 414
Physics news on Phys.org
Sign convention followed:

In the direction of the current=positive
Negative to positive plate=negative
 
shrabastee said:
Sign convention followed:

In the direction of the current=positive
Negative to positive plate=negative

The solution is correct. I almost never use the voltage/loop rule.

If you give the node at the top an unknown potential V, and the node at the bottom a potential
0, you only have to use the current rule once to get a single equation for V.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top